Galileo's Basilisk — hex_m_hell

Galileo's Basilisk<br>April 30, 2026I am disappointed that I have to write this. It is deeply embarrassing that the thing I am writing about has gone on for so long, that so many people have been so poorly educated in philosophy, while so well-educated in so many other things, as to not already recognize everything I'm saying as intuitive. It is deeply embarrassing, as a human, that the most powerful among us, with all the time they could ever want, either never bothered to learn even elementary philosophy or entirely lack the logical faculties to apply their knowledge. I am sad that we are here, dominated by absolute buffoons, who believe themselves to be the smartest people who ever lived. STEM master race, indeed.

Galileo

Let us begin our ridicule of Elon Musk and his ilk in 1610, after Galileo Galilei publishes his celestial observations in Sidereus Nuncius. Arthur Berry's A Short History of Astronomy (1898) provides gives us some context:

His first observations at once threw a flood of light on the nature of our nearest celestial neighbour, the moon. It was commonly believed that the moon, like the other celestial bodies, was perfectly smooth and spherical, and the cause of the familiar dark markings on the surface was quite unknown.

Galilei discovered at once a number of smaller markings, both bright and dark[…], and recognised many of the latter as shadows of lunar mountains cast by the sun; and further identified bright spots seen near the boundary of the illuminated and dark portions of the moon as mountain-tops just catching the light of the rising or setting sun, while the surrounding lunar area was still in darkness. […]

[T]he really significant results of his observations were that the moon was in many important respects similar to the earth, that the traditional belief in its perfectly spherical form had to be abandoned, and that so far the received doctrine of the sharp distinction to be drawn between things celestial and things terrestrial was shewn to be without justification; the importance of this in connection with the Coppernican view that the earth, instead of being unique, was one of six planets revolving round the sun, needs no comment.

The Ptolemaic model of the universe (the geocentric model that<br>predated the heliocentric model we use today) also included the Aristitilian assertion that all heavenly bodies had to be perfect spheres. It was from logic, not observation, that intellectuals of the day believed the highest truth was derived (this is, perhaps, pointedly relevant). Galileo's observations were then met with an interesting logical parry. Referencing Berry once again:

One of Galilei's numerous scientific opponents[…] attempted to explain away the apparent contradiction between the old theory and the new observations by the ingenious suggestion that the apparent valleys in the moon were in reality filled with some invisible crystalline material, so that the moon was in fact perfectly spherical. To this Galilei replied that the idea was so excellent that he wished to extend its application, and accordingly maintained that the moon had on it mountains of this same invisible substance, at least ten times as high as any which he had observed.

Roko's Basilisk

And with this we jump forward to 2010, when a reverse ouroboros going by the name Roko started the world's worst religion by posting on the form of the site LessWrong (a name surprisingly antithetical to reality). Let's use LessWrong's own description here:

Roko used ideas in decision theory to argue that a sufficiently powerful AI agent would have an incentive to torture anyone who imagined the agent but didn't work to bring the agent into existence. The argument was called a “basilisk” because merely hearing the argument would supposedly put you at risk of torture from this hypothetical agent — a basilisk in this context is any information that harms or endangers the people who hear it.

Basically, people will, at some point in the future, create a godlike super being (now popularly known as “Artificial General Intelligence” or “AGI”). That superintelligence will be functionally all-powerful because it can simulate reality. It could then use this simulation to find out about everyone who ever knew about this idea and didn't work to bring this being into existence. It would then, in the future… uh… * checks notes * simulate those people who didn't help it in the past to… torture them. Which would, of course, cause the actual people to experience the simulated suffering… somehow. And this whole scheme would work as a type of blackmail against those people in the past so that they would make this future entity exist.

This was described as an “information hazard” because knowledge of idea was itself the blackmail, so simply knowing of its existence would then doom you to either spend your life helping create said basilisk or to be eternally tortured by it…uh… in a simulation. Or it...