CtxVault - Governed Context Projection

Then what?

Before Agents pull from memory, docs, tickets, and local files.<br>Reviewers cannot tell what actually shaped the next answer.

With CtxVault The AI-facing packet carries selected, caveated, blocked, and omitted evidence.<br>The team can inspect the receipt before trusting the output.

After Unsafe or unsupported context has a visible reason.<br>Bad projections have a rollback target instead of a blame trail.

The control point

Source refs Public or local evidence starts as candidate context.

Review decision Refs are selected, caveated, blocked, omitted, or marked unsupported.

Context packet Reviewed material can become an AI-facing packet such as AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md.

Receipt Hashes, side effects, omissions, and rollback path stay inspectable.

mem0 read-only governance case study

The case study makes the pain visible: from 2056 candidate refs, only 478 were selected, 263 were caveated, 98 were blocked, and 1217 were omitted from the projected context. This is about governing influence, not storing more memory.

2056 candidate refs

839 surfaced refs

478 selected refs

263 caveated refs

98 blocked refs

Selected Public docs and protocol refs.<br>Evidence precision: 0.570.

Caveated Public but scope-sensitive generated or workflow refs.<br>Credential-shaped examples stay bounded.

Blocked / omitted Media assets and credential-shaped markers are not promoted.<br>Omitted samples are visible up to the receipt cap.

This public case study uses a sanitized extract over a pinned public OSS receipt. It does not run mem0 code, call a provider/model, execute an adapter, write target files, judge project quality, or imply maintainer endorsement.

Read the evidence

Deep dive<br>· Public JSON extract<br>· GitHub repository