[2509.02462] Can we cite Wikipedia? What if Wikipedia was more reliable than its detractors ?

-->

Computer Science > Computers and Society

arXiv:2509.02462 (cs)

[Submitted on 2 Sep 2025 (v1), last revised 26 Nov 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:Can we cite Wikipedia? What if Wikipedia was more reliable than its detractors ?

Authors:Mohamed El Louadi<br>View a PDF of the paper titled Can we cite Wikipedia? What if Wikipedia was more reliable than its detractors ?, by Mohamed El Louadi

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Wikipedia, a widely successful encyclopedia recognized in academic circles and used by both students and professors alike, has led educators to question whether it can be cited as an information source, given its widespread use for this very purpose. The dilemma quickly emerged: if Wikipedia has become the go-to information source for so many, why can't it be cited? If consulting and using Wikipedia as a source of information is permitted, why does it become controversial the moment one attempts to cite it? This manuscript examines the systematic rejection of Wikipedia in academic settings, not to argue for its legitimacy as a source, but to demonstrate that its reliability is often underestimated while traditional academic sources enjoy disproportionate credibility, despite their increasingly apparent shortcomings. The central thesis posits that Wikipedia's rejection stems from an outdated epistemological bias that overlooks both the project's verification mechanisms and the structural crises affecting scientific publishing.

Subjects:

Computers and Society (cs.CY)

ACM classes:<br>A.0; A.2; K.3.1; K.4.2

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2509.02462 [cs.CY]

(or<br>arXiv:2509.02462v2 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.02462

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history<br>From: Mohamed El Louadi [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Tue, 2 Sep 2025 16:16:24 UTC (90 KB)

[v2]<br>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 19:24:53 UTC (90 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Can we cite Wikipedia? What if Wikipedia was more reliable than its detractors ?, by Mohamed El Louadi<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context: cs.CY

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2025-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

Links to Code Toggle

Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |<br>Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)