When Kierkegaard Got Cancelled by Daniel Goodman
My Account<br>Sign Out
My Account
Home
My Account
Subscriptions
Newsletters
Orders
Downloads
View Cart<br>Subtotal: $
Checkout
Sign In
Renew
Subscribe
Magazine
Books
Podcast
Events
Latest
Books & Culture
Education
The Good Life
Faith & Spirituality
Technology
Nature & Environment
Food and Farming
Politics
Life in Community
Family & Parenting
All Topics
Email Signup
Events
Contributors
About Us
Current Issue
Back Issues
Customer Service
Subscription Options
Give a Gift
Comments
In This Article<br>Article
Share
Comments
Next Article: The Iraqi Christians I Never Saw<br>Read
Comments
Comments
Post a Comment
Close
Comment))[\s\S]*$" data-val-required="Please enter your comment" id="CommentText" name="CommentText" rows="2">
Name
Submit
Gary Furnell
14 days ago
A terrific article, beautifully written.<br>Kierkegaard, like Pascal, was rich with special insight, the delivery often augmented with wonderful, sardonic humour.
matt sinclair
21 days ago
Insightful. Thank you
Mitch Martina
21 days ago
Thanks, Daniel, for this extensive treatment of my favorite author—I learned a good deal I didn't know about Kierkegaard's life. A much-needed reminder of the necessity of passion, inwardness, and purity of heart.
The year was 1845. At the time, the country of Denmark was experiencing a cultural renaissance of sorts. This “golden age” swelled with nationalistic fervor, artistic innovation, and intense political debate. Among its many rising cultural voices was Peder Ludvig Møller, a romantic poet and critic who often clashed with the rigid Hegelian orthodoxy seeping into the academy. He fancied himself a public figure in the mold of Lord Byron – sophisticated, worldly, and drawn to art and scandal.
Rising alongside him was Søren Kierkegaard.
The two men shared surface-level similarities. They were close in age and both studied at the University of Copenhagen. Each also saw himself as a rebel against the rote conventions of the day, yet their defiance took strikingly different forms. Møller’s public notoriety stood in sharp contrast to Kierkegaard’s introspective methods, defense of fidelity, and relentless pursuit of religious truth.
A confrontation between these two would ignite one of the most notorious clashes in Danish literary history.
Bad Press
The controversy began on December 22, 1845.
Around this time, Kierkegaard completed his Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, which he regarded as the capstone of his work to date. With the tome finished, he intended to step back from public drama. He even toyed with the idea of pursuing the quiet life of a rural pastor. But the peaceful transition he envisioned never arrived.
The trouble began when Møller published an uncharitable review of one of Kierkegaard’s books in his well-regarded Gaea Aesthetic Yearbook.
Møller’s took aim at Kierkegaard’s philosophical novel Stages on Life’s Way, particularly the section featuring the character Johannes the Seducer. As the unsavory name suggests, this Don Juan figure offers a brazen defense of refined hedonism. Møller insinuated that many of his more vulgar antics were thinly veiled reflections of Kierkegaard himself, especially in light of the philosopher’s famously turbulent broken engagement to Regine Olsen.
Worse still, Møller seemed to miss the point of the book entirely. Taking Kierkegaard’s irony at face value, he ended up celebrating the libertine worldview of Johannes. In doing so, Møller did more than scorn the author – he mangled the work as an endorsement of the very message Kierkegaard sought to oppose.
Usually, a poor review could be ignored. But Kierkegaard knew what others did not. Møller – despite cultivating a façade of intellectual prestige – held undisclosed ties to The Corsair, Copenhagen’s most notorious satirical magazine and scandal sheet.
The Corsair
True to its name, The Corsair cultivated a reputation for mischief. The magazine thrived on the polarization of its day, taking equal pleasure in mocking the political extremism of radicals and of conservatives.
Under the editorship of Meïr Goldschmidt, the magazine’s fortunes soared by exploiting the public’s appetite for outrage. Articles frequently relied on exaggerated – and at times outright false – stories about Denmark’s most prominent figures. Accuracy and integrity were secondary to the relentless churn of opinions. The formula worked. For all its disrepute, The Corsair became a national sensation.
The situation was further complicated by a past friendship. As it happened, Kierkegaard and Goldschmidt, the magazine’s gifted young editor, were once on friendly terms. Goldschmidt even sought Kierkegaard’s counsel upon assuming control of the...