US Troops Leaving Germany: NATO's Real Security Problem

Fox and Lion

SubscribeSign in

Pulling 5,000 Troops from Germany Is Not a Big Deal<br>The U.S. military has been reducing its European footprint since 2013, and with Russia rearming and NATO under pressure, Europe is running out of time to close the gap

Fox and Lion<br>May 22, 2026

Share

The U.S. recently announced that it would withdraw approximately 5,000 troops from Germany over the course of the next year. The media did not hesitate to point fingers at President Trump’s supposed feud with German Chancellor Merz, but is that really the whole picture?<br>Mr Merz himself has denied any direct connection, and actually, he’s right. This removal of 5,000 troops, while not officially confirmed by the Pentagon, is roughly equivalent to the size of an Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT) – and the removal of a single ABCT would merely leave the U.S. military presence in Germany a similar size to its force posture before Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In short, not much has changed, when you look at the numbers.<br>However, what can be said for certain is that this change has been part of a larger trend of U.S. deterrence policy for over a decade. A trend that has larger implications for the state of European security in general – and one that’s been a long time coming.

Subscribe to Fox and Lion for the latest defence analyses, jobs, news, and more.

Subscribe

Ten Years in The Making

During the Cold War, the U.S. positioned massive numbers of troops in Europe, at times up to 6,000 tanks. These numbers dropped, understandably, after the dissolution of the USSR, but until 2012-2013, when both were deactivated, the U.S. maintained two Heavy Brigade Combat Teams (the previous iteration of the ABCT) in Germany.<br>In 2013, as part of a 16% reduction to the end strength of the U.S. Army, President Obama replaced the armoured units in Europe with rotational “Regionally Aligned Forces (RAFs)”. RAFs, which are deployed into and out of Europe every nine months, generally consist of one ABCT, one Combat Aviation Brigade (CAB), and one sustainment task force.<br>Other drawdowns are occurring in Europe, not just Germany: as recently as October 2025, the US military announced a drawdown in Romania, reducing the number of US troops to around 1,000. As to the most recent drawdown, German Minister of Defence Boris Pistorius has emphasised that the move did not come as a surprise, saying that it was “expected”. That this is in line with longtime U.S. military policy would make more sense than the sensationalised line that Trump is pulling troops as a petty comeback against another world leader.

Well, for One Thing No Bear Claws

Yes, the escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian war into a full-scale invasion did indeed lead to a temporary increase in U.S. military forces in Europe to include an additional ABCT and an Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT, recently motorised and reflagged as Mobile BCTs), as well as a variety of enablers and headquarters.<br>However, four years on, the threat from Russia is nowhere near what it was. Over the course of the war, Russia has suffered at least a million casualties, not to mention similarly staggering losses of equipment, and the crippling of its Black Sea Fleet. Here are the Ukrainian estimates:

Statistics on estimated overall enemy combat losses as of 21.05.26 by the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine<br>The Russian threat to Europe, at least for the near future, is significantly less, thanks mainly to the valour, dedication, and grit of our friends in Ukraine. While still dangerous, Russia is seriously weakened.<br>The threat of Russia now – temporarily – neutralised, the U.S. is focusing its defence efforts on more pressing security concerns elsewhere. Current events show that the Middle East will continue to matter, and China is the pacing competitor for the U.S.

L ike Butter Scraped over Too Much Bread

While theoretically the elimination of permanently stationed armoured troops in Europe in favour of a rotation system should be easier and cheaper, it cannot be further from the truth. Rotational deployments have taken a heavy toll on the U.S. military, hindering modernisation, impacting mental health, and costing more money than they should.<br>Modernisation should be a priority, but a brigade that spends nine out of every 27 months forward deployed on austere bases conducting, at best, varying amounts of training with similarly varying quality, not to mention seven to eight months of those 27 spent packing, shipping, and unpacking equipment, is not laser-focused on modernisation and transformation. And this only scratches the surface of the other requirements, personnel changes, and disruptions these units face.<br>The impact on job satisfaction, mental health, and retention is grisly: between 2019 and 2021, soldiers in ABCTs were more than twice as likely to commit suicide than the average rate across the U.S. Army, and tank crewmen, specifically,...