TikTok disproportionately served anti-Democratic videos during the 2024 election, study finds

PsyPost

Mental Health

Social Psychology

Cognitive Science

Neuroscience

About

No Result

View All Result

Join

My Account

PsyPost

No Result

View All Result

Home

Exclusive

Social Psychology

Political Psychology

TikTok disproportionately served anti-Democratic videos during the 2024 election, study finds

by<br>Eric W. Dolan

May 22, 2026

Reading Time: 4 mins read

[Adobe Stock]

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

A recent study provides evidence that TikTok’s recommendation system tends to expose users to more conservative and anti-Democrat political content than liberal material. This ideological imbalance occurs regardless of a user’s initial political interests, suggesting that automation plays a significant role in modern information access. The research was published in the scientific journal Nature.

Researchers at New York University Abu Dhabi’s AI and Society Lab conducted the new research to explore how automated internet systems shape what political news the public sees. Experts debate whether internet polarization is driven by people seeking out their own preferred viewpoints or by computer algorithms pushing extreme content to keep users engaged.

Corresponding author Talal Rahwan noted the difficulty of answering this question on older platforms. "Our previous work studied recommendation algorithms on YouTube, and a persistent challenge was disentangling algorithmic influence from user self-selection," he told PsyPost.

TikTok offers a helpful environment for testing algorithmic influence because its primary interface relies heavily on automation. "TikTok’s For You page, where the algorithm drives nearly everything users see, offered a uniquely clean setting to study that question, especially with the 2024 election making political content on the platform increasingly consequential," Rahwan added.

To gather data, the researchers created 323 automated bot accounts to act as artificial users, a method sometimes called a sock puppet audit. Between April 30 and November 11, 2024, the scientists launched 21 new accounts each week. Each bot was assigned an age between 22 and 24 to mimic the habits of young adult voters.

Free daily newsletter

The research team used location-masking software to virtually place these phones in specific parts of the country. They assigned the bots to New York to represent a reliably Democratic area, Texas to represent a reliably Republican area, and Georgia to act as a competitive swing state. The scientists used physical smartphones running Android software and reset the phones to factory settings after each weekly test. This process ensured the app could not track the devices across different weeks.

The accounts first went through a training phase to teach the app their supposed political tastes. Some bots watched up to 400 videos from known Republican creators, and others watched up to 400 videos from Democratic creators. The bots viewed each of these training videos for exactly one minute. In Georgia, the authors also included a set of neutral bots that skipped this political training phase entirely, acting as a control group of users with no political interest.

After the training phase, the accounts switched to the main feed to see what the algorithm would recommend. The bots watched the first ten seconds of each recommended video before moving to the next one. Across the entire 27 weeks, the researchers collected more than 280,000 recommended videos. They successfully downloaded the text transcripts for 40,264 of those videos, giving them a massive dataset of spoken content to analyze.

Google News Preferences

Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

The authors used an ensemble of artificial intelligence language models to classify the political nature of the transcripts. They combined the outputs of three different models to prevent any single program from skewing the results. Human political science students validated the accuracy of these automated programs. The tools determined if a video was political, if it related to the upcoming election, and if it supported or opposed a specific party.

The findings suggest a distinct asymmetry in how political content is delivered on the platform. Accounts trained on Republican videos received about 11.5 percent more content aligned with their own party compared to the Democratic accounts. At the same time, the Democratic accounts were exposed to roughly 7.5 percent more cross-party content.

Co-author Yasir Zaki explained the broader implications of these numbers. "TikTok’s feed isn’t a neutral window into politics," he said. "The platform’s recommendations treat Democrats and Republicans differently, consistently, across states, and in ways that can’t be explained by differences in how people engage with the content."

Hazem Ibrahim, also a researcher at New York University Abu Dhabi, noted the specific...