Daring Fireball: The Fonts of the U.S. Federal Courts

By John Gruber

Archive

The Talk Show

Dithering

Projects

Contact

Colophon

Feeds / Social

Twitter

--><br>Sponsorship

OpenAI, Anthropic, Cursor, and Perplexity chose WorkOS over building it themselves.

The Fonts of the U.S. Federal Courts

Friday, 22 May 2026

The 13 circuits of the U.S. federal courts of appeals operate with a fair amount of independence, including their typographic choices. I was reminded of this today while reading the aforelinked decision from the Ninth Circuit in Epic v. Apple, because the Ninth Circuit sets their decisions in Times New Roman — a font that came up back in December in the context of the Trump State Department.

Long argument short, Times New Roman isn’t bad, but it isn’t good. It is the median choice. But most of the circuit courts use it: the Third, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh. It could be worse: the First and Fourth not only use Courier New (the worst version of Courier, so of course it’s the one Microsoft shipped with Windows), but fully justify their text — contrary to the nature of a monospaced font. It could be better: the Second and Seventh use Palatino. (Note how much better that Seventh Circuit decision looks than the Second’s, with its wider margins creating a narrower column of text.)

But it can be much better. The Fifth Circuit was long typographically superior to its peers, using Century Schoolbook — a highly legible font with great tradition and the right vibe. But in 2020, the Fifth Circuit upgraded, switching to Equity, Matthew Butterick’s excellent type family (which, of course, is used throughout Butterick’s own web book, Typography for Lawyers). Here’s a before and after tweet noting the change. The results are typographically sublime (including improved margins).

The gold standard is the U.S. Supreme Court, which uses Century Schoolbook. Yes, I just praised the Fifth Circuit’s change from Century Schoolbook to Equity as an upgrade, but tradition and consistency have their place. The Supreme Court’s typographic style has been stunningly consistent for — no pun intended — well over a century. (If only that were true of their recent decisions. Rimshot.) Here is last month’s Louisiana v. Callais decision — the gerrymandering/redistricting case. Here is 1954’s Brown v. Board of Education. I’d give the nod to the older one, which made better use of proper small caps, but the overall consistency is obvious.

Here is the 2026 edition of the Rules of the Supreme Court. Not only does the Court use Century Schoolbook for its own decisions, it requires submissions to the Court to use the same (p. 44):

The text of every booklet-format document, including any appendix<br>thereto, shall be typeset in a Century family (e. g., Century<br>Expanded, New Century Schoolbook, or Century Schoolbook) 12-point<br>type with 2-point or more leading between lines. Quotations in<br>excess of 50 words shall be indented. The typeface of footnotes<br>shall be 10-point type with 2-point or more leading between lines.<br>The text of the document must appear on both sides of the page.

Every booklet-format document shall be produced on paper that is<br>opaque, unglazed, and not less than 60 pounds in weight, and<br>shall have margins of at least three-fourths of an inch on all<br>sides. The text field, including footnotes, may not exceed 4⅛<br>by 7⅛ inches.

Why the extra one-eighths of an inch instead of just 4 × 7? I don’t know. But 4⅛ × 7⅛ is exactly the size of the text field in the court’s own decisions.

Now compare the current 2026 rulebook to this edition printed in 1910 (with rules adopted in 1884). The consistency is striking — but, once again, the older version makes better use of small caps and just has a bit more vim and vigor to it. Just look at page 44, for example. It’s perfect. The current Court’s document formatters should aspire only to more closely ape the confidence and sturdiness of this older one. A century from now, U.S. Supreme Court decisions should look as similar to today’s as today’s do to those from a century ago.

The various circuit courts using lesser typefaces, looser margins, and lazier formatting should follow the Fifth’s lead and get their shit together. Tuck your shirt in, comb your hair, straighten your tie, and pop a mint in your mouth. If you’re a United States federal court, your typographic style should reflect that.

Back in 2020, Butterick took a well-deserved victory lap when the Fifth Circuit adopted Equity.1 He quoted Fifth Circuit Judge Don Willett, a typography fan who spearheaded the restyling project, on its rationale. Willett wrote:

[Why] did the circuit devote finite judicial energy to swapping<br>typefaces and widening margins? Simple answer: Our job is not<br>just to present clear opinions, but to present our opinions<br>clearly. Getting the law right is, of course, our tip-top<br>priority. Nothing matters more. ... But good enough is never good<br>enough. Our work is consequential, impacting...