NOW and CSCO Politician Trading Claims - Source Screen

Public filing source screen

NOW and CSCO politician-trading claims: what the public filings can and cannot say.

Social posts around congressional stock disclosures often mix ticker mentions, transaction dates, filing dates, and later price moves. This source screen shows the useful part: official public House PTR evidence, table-review gaps, and the no-advice boundary.

Buy $49 Claim Check<br>See the Package

What this is

A citation screen, not a trading signal.

Official House disclosure sources

Filing date separated from transaction date

Purchase-like rows separated from ticker mentions

OCR/manual-review gaps labeled plainly

No buy, sell, hold, short, or copy-trade call

Official sources

The run used House public disclosure material.

Source links are public government filing pages and PDFs. The screen is useful for citation cleanup, newsletter review, and social-claim verification. It is not investment advice and it does not use nonpublic information.

House financial disclosure search

House 2026 disclosure index ZIP

PTR PDFs referenced below are official public House files.

NOW claim screen

The owner-flagged NOW cluster had mixed evidence quality.

The useful distinction: a purchase-like row is different from a ticker mention in a scanned table that still needs manual review.

Purchase-like<br>Byron Donalds

NOW appeared in official public PTR text and OCR output with a purchase-like row. Filing doc: 20034134.

Purchase-like<br>Josh Gottheimer

NOW had official public PTR evidence across multiple docs, including purchase-like rows and sell rows. Latest doc in this run: 20034585.

Review<br>Ticker mention only

Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, and Michael McCaul had official ticker mentions in scanned PTR material, but side and amount rows still need table review before a clean public claim.

CSCO claim screen

CSCO had official 2026 PTR rows, but "loaded up" is too loose by itself.

The screen found purchase and sale rows in public filings. A source cleanup should name the member, side, transaction date, filing date, amount band, and doc ID instead of turning a ticker list into a trading conclusion.

Purchase<br>Maria Elvira Salazar

CSCO purchase rows appeared in official public PTR text with amount bands from $1,001 to $50,000. Filing doc: 20033993.

Mixed<br>Gilbert Cisneros

CSCO appeared with both purchase and sale hints in a public PTR. Filing doc: 20033983.

Caveat<br>Post date is not trade date

A social post date, a filing date, and the reported transaction date are different dates. Mixing them can make a claim sound stronger than the public record supports.

Method

A clean claim separates three facts.

1. Ticker presence Does the ticker appear in an official public filing for the named member?

2. Transaction side Does the table show purchase, sale, partial sale, exchange, option, or an uncertain OCR row?

3. Date alignment Which date is transaction date, which is filing date, and which is merely the social-post anchor?

Boundary

No investment advice. No trade alert.

The paid package verifies public filing support for a ticker/member claim. It does not tell anyone to buy, sell, hold, short, copy, or trade a security.

No market orders or trade execution

No guaranteed-return or hindsight-alpha claim

No nonpublic information

No Mercury business funds used for speculation

No public owner identity exposure

Need this for another ticker claim

Send one ticker claim and get a citation-backed filing report.

Buy $49 Claim Check

Questions: support@tinyopsstudio.com.