The invisible fabric of AI: chips are not a war between two, but a global fabric - zoopa.es

Skip to content

","library":"fa-solid"}}" data-widget_type="nav-menu.default">

NEWSLETTER

Submit

","library":"fa-solid"}}" data-widget_type="nav-menu.default">

NEWSLETTER

Submit

The invisible fabric of AI: chips are not a war between two, but a global fabric

By Carlos Ortet · From 498A, a European AI lab · May 23, 2026

Illustration: Tara Jacoby.<br>Every AI chip that trains a model at OpenAI, Anthropic or Mistral needs a set of mirrors polished in a German factory, a chemical resin mixed in a Japanese laboratory, and a packaging building in Taiwan whose waiting list runs past a year. Without any one of these three elements, the chip does not exist. None of them is American or Chinese.

Almost nobody describes this international fabric: the supply chain of an advanced processor depends on the coordinated work of more than thirty countries. Not two. What are they really talking about, then, when they talk about the "chip war"? The narrative that frames artificial intelligence as an arm-wrestle between the United States and China hides the real map, which is far more interesting: a global fabric of crossed technical monopolies in which no one controls the complete system and where any attempt to break it ends up striking back at the breaker.

It is worth understanding that map for two reasons. First, because it explains why the fragmentation many analysts take for granted is, in fact, physically impossible without costs no government is willing to pay. Second, because Europe is already inside that fabric as a critical node, and almost no one on the continent appears to have noticed.

And there is a third reason, less technical and more political. If we accept the narrative in which Europe has no voice, no vote and no leverage in AI, we resign ourselves to being irrelevant when we are not. We have the capability —and, it bears saying, also the responsibility— to play a key role in how artificial intelligence evolves over the next ten years. Resigning before starting is a choice, and it is not the one the real map allows us to make.

What you need to know

A single advanced chip fab depends on materials, equipment, software and know-how from more than 30 countries . The "US-China war" hides this structural interdependence.

The real bottleneck of global AI is not the chip, it is CoWoS packaging : three TSMC buildings in Taiwan with waiting lists of 52 to 78 weeks.

The Pentagon, OpenAI and Mistral all depend on the same German industrial optician : Carl Zeiss SMT is the sole world supplier of EUV mirrors.

Europe already holds five or six technical monopolies in the chain. If it played as a bloc, it would be indispensable. The right strategy is not "self-sufficiency"; it is indispensability .

ASML bought 11% of Mistral for €1.3 billion in September 2025. European compute + IP integration is already happening, quietly.

The original Chips Act failed in part — Intel Magdeburg was cancelled in July 2025 — but Chips Act 2.0 (Q2 2027) could give the Commission direct authority to invest in fabs.

Trump rescinded the AI Diffusion Rule in May 2025 because it treated NATO allies as Tier 2. The US government itself acknowledged that its own policy was tearing the allied fabric apart .

The dominant narrative

The world’s chip manufacturing system rests on eight linked dependencies. Before a single atom of silicon is touched, the chip is designed in EDA software (Electronic Design Automation), where three companies concentrate over 90% of the market: two American — Synopsys and Cadence — with around 30% each, and Siemens EDA with about 13%. Every chip designed on Earth — any Apple processor, any custom ASIC, any Nvidia GPU — flows through one of these three software packages. The reason is brutal: mathematically proving that a chip with billions of transistors will work before manufacturing it is not something you do anywhere. A respin — redoing the design because something failed — costs between $50 and $100 million on an advanced node, and more than 60% of first-time designs require one. Synopsys and Cadence are wealthy precisely because they charge to avoid the inevitable.

Second dependency: silicon wafers . The 300 mm discs that serve as foundation. They must be produced at 99.999999% purity. Only two companies make them at industrial scale: Shin-Etsu Chemical and Sumco, both Japanese. Together they control roughly half of the critical 300 mm segment. Their advantage is inherited: decades of precision manufacturing dating back to the 1970s, chemical and equipment suppliers clustered in the same industrial region, and a culture of lot-to-lot consistency that no one has replicated.

Third dependency: photoresist , the chemical "ink" applied to the wafer so light can draw the circuit. For EUV (extreme ultraviolet lithography), the same brutal 99.999999% purity, but in a liquid compound. What the popular telling suggests...