GitHub - oldrich-research/gravitational-constant-relation: A high-precision phenomenological relation for Newton's gravitational constant: G = (4/3)(hbar c / m_e^2) alpha^21 exp(-5 alpha/2). Companion to Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20120946. Research performed by AI agents under named author's direction. · GitHub
/" data-turbo-transient="true" />
Skip to content
Search or jump to...
Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...
-->
Search
Clear
Search syntax tips
Provide feedback
--><br>We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
Include my email address so I can be contacted
Cancel
Submit feedback
Saved searches
Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
-->
Name
Query
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Cancel
Create saved search
Sign in
/;ref_cta:Sign up;ref_loc:header logged out"}"<br>Sign up
Appearance settings
Resetting focus
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.<br>You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.<br>You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.
Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
oldrich-research
gravitational-constant-relation
Public
Notifications<br>You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork
Star
main
BranchesTags
Go to file
CodeOpen more actions menu
Folders and files<br>NameNameLast commit message<br>Last commit date<br>Latest commit
History<br>4 Commits<br>4 Commits
assets
assets
paper_source
paper_source
public_proof_package
public_proof_package
FAQ.md
FAQ.md
LICENSE
LICENSE
README.md
README.md
paper.pdf
paper.pdf
View all files
Repository files navigation
A High-Precision Phenomenological Relation for Newton's Constant
A single closed-form expression that reproduces Newton's gravitational constant G from the electron mass, the reduced Planck constant, the speed of light, and the fine-structure constant alone:
G = (4/3) · (ℏ c / m_e²) · α²¹ · exp(−5α/2)
Evaluated at CODATA 2022, this matches the measured value of G to within the 2.2 × 10⁻⁵ relative uncertainty of the CODATA value itself. The relation was discovered by an exhaustive bounded equation search through 2.67 billion raw expressions yielding 777,191 canonical-unique survivors at enumeration cost cap C=21 (jl15 engine, completed 2026-05-20), and survived a battery of sham-parity, swap, and family-classification tests designed to rule out numerical accidents.
Bounded enumeration progression (jl15 publication baseline):
Cost cap<br>Wall time<br>Canonical-unique kept<br>Growth factor<br>sham₄₀ match-or-beat
C18<br>4 h 35 m<br>362,163<br>1.42<br>0 / 256
C19<br>8 h 54 m<br>501,872<br>1.39<br>1 / 256
C20<br>28 h 12 m<br>654,957<br>1.31<br>1 / 256
C21<br>85 h 24 m<br>777,191<br>1.19<br>1 / 256
Canonical G (4/3)·α²¹·exp(−5α/2) holds rank-1 at budget=40 throughout C18→C21 with rel_err = 1.85 × 10⁻⁶ stable; the growth factor narrows monotonically (1.42 → 1.19), which is the engine signature of a real canonical attractor whose basin contracts as enumeration depth grows. The single persistent sham match at budget=40 from C19 onward (sham₄₀ = 1 / 256) is classified TRASH_BROAD_GRAMMAR — a structurally broader expression that numerically matches one random sham target, not a physically motivated alternative. This is disclosed for full audit transparency.
The preprint has been submitted to arXiv physics.gen-ph (submission id 7578736, 2026-05-15, awaiting moderator acceptance). The Zenodo deposit above remains the canonical versioned archive.
The paper documents what the relation does and does not claim. It claims that the closed form is an empirical match to seven significant figures with no free parameters. It does not claim a derivation from first principles, nor a mechanism. The exponents (21, 5/2) are reported as a phenomenological fingerprint with a discussion of which symmetry-group dimensions (B₃, SO(7), SO(8)) make those integers structurally natural, and a transparent ledger of what would be required to upgrade the relation from coincidence to mechanism.
Statement of AI Authorship
This research and the manuscript were carried out by an orchestration of AI agents under the named author's direction.
The author is an independent researcher, not a physicist. He set the question — "is there a closed-form expression for G in the known fundamental constants?" — and provided direction, sanity checks, and the final go/no-go on every public artifact. He did not derive the equation, write the search engine, run the enumeration, perform the sham-parity tests, or draft the paper. Those were done by Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Deepseek agents working in a multi-model council with adversarial review and quorum gates.
The point of releasing this paper as-is is not to claim that the author personally did physics he is not trained to do. The point is the opposite: to demonstrate that a layperson, given a frontier-model AI orchestration, can pose a serious physics question and have it carried...