Volvo gets US government approval to bypass Chinese connected-car ban - Ars Technica
Skip to content
AI
Biz & IT
Cars
Culture
Gaming
Health
Policy
Science
Security
Space
Tech
Forum
Subscribe
Story text
Size
Small<br>Standard<br>Large
Width
Standard<br>Wide
Links
Standard<br>Orange
* Subscribers only
Learn more
Pin to story
Theme
Search
Sign In
Sign in dialog...
Text<br>settings
Story text
Size
Small<br>Standard<br>Large
Width
Standard<br>Wide
Links
Standard<br>Orange
* Subscribers only
Learn more
Minimize to nav
Volvo Cars got some welcome news from the US Department of Commerce yesterday. The government has told the Swedish automaker, which is partly owned by China’s Zhejiang Geely Holding, that it may import connected cars into the US, despite a ban on such vehicle software with Chinese links from model year 2027 onward.
Protectionism is nothing new to the US automotive segment; the absence of foreign-built pickup trucks on US roads is still a consequence of 1964’s “chicken tax,” for example. More recently, in a rare example of bipartisanship, the focus has been on keeping China out. In 2024, then-President Biden first levied a 100 percent tariff on Chinese imports, followed by a new Commerce rule that prohibited imports of any connected vehicles built by companies owned by or with links to China.
The following year, the Trump administration entered office with very different overall priorities, but there was little daylight between the two on the topic of Chinese cars; the ban would go into effect for software from model year 2027 as planned, with connected vehicle hardware forbidden from model year 2030 onward. Automakers can petition the government for an exemption, though, and it seems they will be granted.
“Volvo Cars has been granted a specific authorization from the Office of Information and Communications Technology and Services under the ‘Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain: Connected Vehicles’ rule in the United States,” the company said in a statement.
“Under the rule, Volvo Car USA was required to follow a process with the US Department of Commerce to obtain a specific authorization for the continued import and sale of connected cars in the US,” Volvo said. “The process is carried out on a case-by-case basis, and the issuance of a specific authorization follows constructive discussions with the US Department of Commerce and other US officials regarding Volvo Cars’ governance, technology, and data security.”
Polestar, which is part-owned by Volvo and is also affected by the Commerce rule, told Ars that it “continue[s] to work with US authorities to meet the requirements of the announced regulations.”
Now that Volvo has shown it’s possible for an OEM to successfully convince the Commerce Department that it complies with the new connected car rule, it raises the likelihood that other Chinese EVs, which are of growing interest to US car buyers, may still yet enter the US market in the coming years.
Jonathan M. Gitlin
Automotive Editor
Jonathan M. Gitlin
Automotive Editor
Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica's automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.
62 Comments
Staff Picks
I'm not surprised; but I'm endlessly frustrated by how effectively the 'zOMG CHICOM SPYING!' angle seems to deflect internally coherent reflection.
Sure, tiktok is a variety of unpleasant things, probably deliberately; and TP-Link's firmware security is hot garbage and you're goddamn right Chinese electric cars are phoning home to HQ to an alarming degree; but all of those things are problems not primarily because China is involved.
And yet; we get fuck all focus on social media issues(beyond the convenience as a tool for demanding user identification), pitiful lip service to software quality and security; and a bunch of protectionist bans that leave anyone who isn't China free to phone home whatever they want for whatever purposes they want.
Tech is riddled with very real gaping problems around security, privacy, and basically everyone in a position of influence in the sector; but let's pretend it's fine as long as the abuses are domestic...
May 27, 2026 at 3:07 pm
Comments
Forum view
Loading comments...
Prev story
Next story
1.<br>Millions of AI agents imperiled by critical vulnerability in open source package
2.<br>Amazing interior, controversial exterior: Ferrari's first electric car
3.<br>Musk says US military suicide drones used Starlink in violation of SpaceX rules
4.<br>Analyst on China's spent rocket stages: "Things only continue to get worse"
5.<br>We're starting to see some PC makers respond to Apple's MacBook Neo
Customize