The employment effects of ICE enforcement in US cities

tolerance1 pts0 comments

Shock, awe, and economic fallout | Brookings

Home

Search

Home

Search

Home

Shock, awe, and economic fallout

Downloads

Downloads

Appendix A: Data and methods

Appendix B: Sectoral effects

Appendix C: City statistics

See More

Contact

Contact

Global Media Office

[email protected]

202.540.7753

Share

Share

Bluesky Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.comBluesky

Search

Sections

Sections

Downloads

Downloads

Appendix A: Data and methods

Appendix B: Sectoral effects

Appendix C: City statistics

See More

Contact

Contact

Global Media Office

[email protected]

202.540.7753

Share

Share

Bluesky Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.comBluesky

Subscribe to Global Connection

Sign Up

Research

Shock, awe, and economic fallout

The employment effects of ICE enforcement in US cities

Marcela Escobari,

Marcela Escobari

Vice President and Director<br>- Global Economy and Development

Ian Seyal, and

Ian Seyal

Senior Project Manager and Senior Research Analyst<br>- Global Economy and Development

Paul Beach

PB

Paul Beach

Research Analyst<br>- Workforce of the Future initiative

May 29, 2026

The enforcement surge cost 668,000 jobs. Across the cities with the sharpest rise in ICE arrests, employment fell 0.73% below what they would have seen absent the surge, and 1.48% in the 51 cities observed at least six months out.

Job losses far exceeded the number of people arrested. Across 86 surge cities, ICE made roughly 52,000 excess arrests, yet each excess arrest, as a proxy for the broader enforcement shock, is associated with 13 jobs lost overall. Of the 668,000 jobs lost, an estimated 51,000-297,000 would have been held by American-born workers.

Losses concentrated in immigrant-intensive sectors but spread well beyond them. The deepest direct hits fell on construction and on accommodation and food services, but industries with very few immigrant workers—such as arts and entertainment—also contracted sharply.

Tactical law enforcement officers conduct an operation outside a grocery store in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Jan. 6, 2026. (Credit: Robert V Schwemmer/Shutterstock)

39 min read

Bluesky Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.comBluesky

Print

Sections

Toggle section navigation

Sections

Downloads

Appendix A: Data and methods

Appendix B: Sectoral effects

Appendix C: City statistics

See More

Contact

Global Media Office

[email protected]

202.540.7753

Print

Follow the authors

Marcela Escobari

Ian Seyal

See More

More On

Business & Workforce

Sub-Topics

Future of Work Workforce Development

Cities & Communities

Sub-Topics

Economic Development Regional Inequality

Defense & Security

Sub-Topics

Homeland Security & Public Safety

Society & Culture

Sub-Topics

Demographics & Population Immigrants & Immigration

U.S. Economy

Sub-Topics

Labor & Unemployment

North America

Sub-Topics

U.S. States and Territories

Program

Global Economy and Development

Executive summary

The current administration’s 2025 interior immigration enforcement campaign has been promoted, in large part, as a labor market policy: remove unauthorized workers and create jobs for Americans. This research evaluates that claim and finds the reverse: Enforcement surges cost jobs, including jobs held by American-born workers.

Spearheaded by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the 2025 campaign represented a sharp break from prior enforcement policy in scale and tactics. The 2025 approach, in the administration’s own description, was built around “shock and awe” tactics:1 highly visible raids, worksite arrests, and viral videos of detentions—acts designed to induce fear in a broad population. Moreover, where previous administrations across both parties paired enforcement with expanded pathways for lawful presence and entry to meet U.S. labor demand,2 the 2025 approach abandoned that pairing, launching an enforcement-only campaign coupled with policies to squeeze legal migration.

We compare employment outcomes between cities that experienced a sharp surge in ICE activity in the first half of 2025 and those that did not. This approach isolates the specific effect of enforcement surges on local economies and rules out other potential drivers of job loss, such as tariffs, war, inflation, and AI.

We find that employment trajectories in surge and non-surge cities were closely aligned before enforcement began. They diverged precisely when ICE arrests intensified. The gap widened over time, and the knock-on effects extended far beyond those directly targeted. In surge cities, employment fell most in immigrant-intensive sectors, but job losses spread further. American-born workers also experienced job loss.

Key findings

The enforcement surge cost 668,000 jobs . Across the top 25% of cities (86 of 341 in our sample) that experienced the sharpest rise in ICE arrests,3 employment fell an average of 0.73% below what those cities would likely have seen absent the surge.4

Job losses far exceeded the number of...

enforcement cities appendix surge employment global

Related Articles