Pretext, Pretext, Pretext - by Ryan Moser
Seeing The System
SubscribeSign in
Pretext, Pretext, Pretext<br>Building reasons to be together
Ryan Moser<br>Jun 01, 2026
Share
My wife Joanna is a ceramics artist, and I recently joined her for a soda reduction firing. It’s a skilled, labor-intensive process and the entire day, end-to-end, is about 12 hours. She was joined by eight other artists working to expand their range of techniques. The person running the kiln was teaching everyone else how to interpret the shape of the flame, to dial in the backpressure, to recognize what the smell of the combustion is telling them. The day mixed periods of intense activity and obsessive record keeping with long stretches of downtime.<br>When they had the first stretch of downtime in the morning as the kiln was coming up to temperature, they could have stepped away from the studio, opened laptops, or given attention to any number of the solo projects going on, but they did none of those things. The next order of business, at 9am, was setting up a charcuterie board. This served as a focal point when the kiln did not demand their collective attention.<br>I went expecting to see a group of artists connecting with their work, and they did. What I did not expect was how the artistic practice would be braided with a group of human beings connecting with each other. Downtime around the charcuterie board wasn’t a break from the practice; it was part of the social fabric that makes a twelve-hour communal firing something people return to. The talk during the downtime was often about the work: readings, measurements, observations when they peered inside the kiln. The connection was mediated by the practice even during the downtime.
Imagine an adult asking another group of adults if they want to spend an entire day hanging out. Many factors conspire to make this a difficult ask. Awkwardness, the looming possibility of rejection, the need to justify all of the other responsibilities of life, feeling like the event might demand more intimacy than the relationship can carry.
Contrast this with “Would you like to spend Saturday firing a soda kiln?”. It’s a sentence anyone can say (at least any potter) without taking on a lot of risk. The activity hands its participants a socially unimpeachable reason to spend an entire Saturday together. It’s an alibi that hides the day’s social function from outside observers, and sometimes from the participants themselves.
Pottery studios in major metros have waitlists over a year long. Climbing gyms are exploding in popularity. Run clubs have become a major social outlet. Ham radio is experiencing a renaissance. None of these activities are new. And yet at this particular moment, something has started pushing people toward serious practice done in the company of others.
Offices, conferences, business travel, coworking were giant alibis for human proximity dressed up as productivity. Until 2020, these activities were unavoidable for most white-collar workers. Remote work, which went from fringe to default almost overnight in 2020, eroded these structures, and they have not fully recovered. AI threatens to finish what co-working started by shrinking teams and hollowing out workforces.
As the structures erode, the demand for connection doesn’t disappear. It has to land somewhere. The categories that can hold it, the ones built around serious practice with built-in downtime, are about to inherit a load they weren’t designed for.
Building one of these is harder than it looks. I know because I tried.<br>Last year I hosted an event that I called “Crossroads and Confessions: A Dinner of Defining Moments”. This was a curated discussion inspired by The Art of Gathering, focused on the fork in the road decisions that had most defined your life.<br>These were people I’d known socially for years. The women came. Their partners, who were also on the invitation, did not.<br>On an episode of Modern Wisdom, Chris Williamson and Matthew Hussey discuss how difficult it is for men to open up with each other when you just put them in a room. But, if you position the same men around a broken lawnmower, everything they’ve been bottling up comes spilling out. The legitimacy of the doing creates the permission for the being. Pretext, pretext, pretext, and the people inside are the better for it.<br>Simply telling people to “open up more” fails because it ignores scaffolding, context, and the risk people feel being vulnerable. This is why men’s groups and vulnerability circles are not a scalable solution to the presence problem. The price of entry is competence with emotional discourse, so they are unsuitable for people who most need the help. Activity-based presence groups make competence with the activity the barrier to entry, with presence as the byproduct. Astronomy, fermentation, bowling, knitting. There are a hundred doors, and people need only choose one to talk through.<br>This is where the Crossroads party ran into trouble. The...