From Pindar to Pixels — the lipogram in the digital age | by Ian G | Jun, 2026 | MediumSitemapOpen in appSign up<br>Sign in

Medium Logo

Get app<br>Write

Search

Sign up<br>Sign in

From Pindar to Pixels — the lipogram in the digital age

Ian G

7 min read·<br>Just now

Listen

Share

How an ancient literary constraint found its most radical expression on the internet

Press enter or click to view image in full size

I. A constraint older than the printing press<br>In the sixth centuryBCE, the Greek poet Lasus of Hermione, composed an ode to Demether without a single use of the letter sigma — the most common consonant in ancient Greek, because its hissing sound was considered ungraceful.<br>Pindar, a student of Lasus, mentionns this innovationin a fragment, where he alludes to the dithyramb and the absence of “s”.<br>Whether this was a philosophical statement, a technical feat, or simply a game, historians cannot say with certainty. What is certain is that the impulse to write around a letter — to make absence itself meaningful — is as old as literature.<br>The word comes from the Greek: leipogrammatos — leipo meaning to lack, gramma meaning letter. A lipogram is, literally, a text that lacks a letter. Over two millennia, the form surfaced and submerged across literary history.<br>Tryphiodorus wrote a 24-book Odyssey in which each book avoided one letter of the Greek alphabet. The Spanish Golden Age playwright Lope de Vega produced five novels, each excluding one vowel — a — e — i — o — u — as if working through a linguistic scale. The 17th-century writer Gregorio Silvestre composed poems without the letter a; others without r, without s, without the letters that most challenged them.<br>For most of literary history, the lipogram was considered a curiosity. A parlour trick for scholars. Evidence of virtuosity, perhaps — but not of serious artistic intent. Then came the Oulipo.<br>II. The Oulipo and the rehabilitation of constraint<br>In November 1960, the mathematician François Le Lionnais and the novelist Raymond Queneau founded a small, semi-secret collective in Paris. They called it the Ouvroir de Littérature Potentielle — the Workshopof Potential Literature. Its members, over the decades, would include Italo Calvino, Marcel Duchamp, and Georges Perec.<br>The Oulipo’s central conviction was radical and, at the time, deeply unfashionable: constraints do not imprison the writer. They liberate them. The surrealists had sought freedom through the unconscious — automatic writing, dreams, the dissolution of rational control.<br>The Oulipians sought freedom through its opposite: rigorous, self-imposed, mathematical structure. The constraint forces the writer off the well- worn paths of language. It generates surprise. It produces what Queneau called potential literature — works that exist not just in what is written, but in the vast unexplored space of what could be written under the same rules.<br>Georges Perec took this philosophy to its extreme. In 1969, he published La Disparition — a detective novel of over 300 pages written entirely without the letter e. In French, where e is the most common letter in the language, this is a staggering achievement. The novel’s title itself — La Disparition, meaning The Disappearance or The Void — enacts what it describes. The missing letter haunts every sentence. Characters die searching for something they cannot name. The reader who does not know the constraint may finish the book without ever noticing. The reader who does cannot stop seeing the absence everywhere. Raymond Queneau reviewed the manuscript. His verdict, according to Oulipo legend: “I didn’t notice the e was missing until page 90.” La Disparition was translated into English by Gilbert Adair in 1994 as A Void — itself a lipogram, maintaining the constraint throughout.<br>The translation is considered one of the most extraordinary feats in the history of literary translation.<br>III. The digital turn<br>The internet arrived. And with it, a new space of inscription: the URL.<br>A Uniform Resource Locator is, at its most basic, a string of characters that points to a location on a network. But it is also, unavoidably, a text. It is read. It is shared. It carries meaning beyond its technical function. A URL can be beautiful, ugly, cryptic, poetic, or absurd.<br>Could it be lipogrammatic?<br>The question, as far as we know, was never formally posed — until a small Iranian digital media agency, following the removal of their video channel by a major technology platform, registered a domain name that answered it definitively.<br>The URL: abcdijkmnpqrstuvwxyz.com. The constraint: the 26 letters of the Latin alphabet, minus the four distinct letters of a technology company’s name — E, G, L, O.<br>The message: the alphabet, without that company. The internet, as it might exist, were that presence subtracted. In a single registered domain, an act of Oulipian logic had migrated from the page to the address bar.<br>IV. What changes — and what does not<br>The digital lipogram inherits...