Clean City Law: Secrets of São Paulo Uncovered by Outdoor Advertising Ban - 99% Invisible

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

Submit Search

YouTube

TikTok

Instagram

Threads

Reddit

Discord

Bluesky

99% Invisible Newsletter

100% Fascinating

Email Address

Yes Please! By submitting this form, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, that you understand them, and that you agree to be bound by them. If you do not agree to be bound by the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, you may not use the 99% Invisible website and services.

see recent newsletter

Close

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Leave a Comment

When São Paulo introduced its Clean City Law (Lei Cidade Limpa) a decade ago, over 15,000 marketing billboards were taken down. An additional 300,000 ostentatious business signs, hanging over streets or painted in large letters on facades, were also subject to a hefty fine if they were not removed promptly. Bus, taxi, and poster advertisements had to go as well. Even handing out pamphlets on the street was prohibited. While this legislation helped clean up the largest city in Brazil, it also revealed surprises hiding behind ad-covered urban signs and surfaces.

Before and after images by Marcelo Palinkas of the S&atilde;o Paulo City Council<br>The move to ban ads in this giant metropolis was controversial, in part due to its substantial estimated impact on the local economy. The law was (predictably) fought at all stages by business groups with a vested commercial interest in buying and selling prime public ad space.

Some arguments from the business community were framed as selfless. A lack of ads, according to one such argument, would lead to less lighting (of billboards and walls) and thus more dangerous streets. Other arguments were more blatantly self-interested. Clear Channel Outdoor, one of the world’s biggest outdoor-advertising companies, went so far as to sue the city, claiming the ban was unconstitutional.

In the end, the law went into effect on January 1st, 2007, and businesses were given 90 days to comply or pay the price.

Before and after images by Marcelo Palinkas of the S&atilde;o Paulo City Council<br>Most citizens were fans of the initiative, including local reporter Vinicius Galvao, who writes for the Folha de S&atilde;o Paulo, Brazil’s largest newspaper. He notes that his hometown is "a very vertical city,&rdquo; but before the law "you couldn&rsquo;t even [see] the architecture of the old buildings, because they were just covered with billboards and logos and propaganda. And there was no criteria [to restrict them].&rdquo;

Signs, billboards and building walls shortly after the Clean City law was passed, images by Tony de Marco<br>While the law had broad public support, some residents were worried for financial, pragmatic, and aesthetic reasons. For starters, the city would not only lose revenue from absent ads, but would have to actively spend money taking down the resulting ghost town of empty billboards. Further: signs, no matter how corporate, can be wayfinding devices, and stripping them could make familiar routes harder to follow. Other critics were nervous that without the colorful veneer of advertisements the urban environment might look worse rather than better, unmasked as a gloomy concrete cityscape. Passing the Clean City Law did uncover a number of things no one expected, for better and worse.

Rocinha, the largest favela in Brazil (located in Rio de Janeiro), image by chensiyuan, GFDL<br>As it turned out, advertisements were quite literally covering up problems with the city that needed to be addressed. Removing billboards revealed, for instance, the presence of certain smaller shanty towns (known as favelas) that few knew existed, hidden as they were behind a vertical landscape of giant signs. As facade-spanning ads were pulled down from the sides of buildings, immigrants living inside of the same factories in which they worked (often in poor conditions) were discovered. Crumbling civic infrastructure was also cast into the spotlight, made more visible in the absence of distracting ads.

Vertical building mural stands out against the lack of street advertising<br>Cleaning up ads from the sides of buildings also inadvertently freed up more space for street artists to work with, and helped make new and existing artworks stand out against the urban environment.

Enthusiastic city workers, however, took things a step further than people expected when it first came to enforcing the law. Certain public murals were wiped clean, causing concern among citizens. The removal of one 2,000-foot-long work in particular sparked local outrage as well as global press coverage. Eventually, with public support, the city created an official registry to protect key extant and future pieces of street art, now more visible than ever.

Before and after images by Marcelo Palinkas of the S&atilde;o Paulo...