Feedback wanted: Atlas proof receipts for critical digital actions · rodriguezaa22ar-boop/atlas-trust-infrastructure · Discussion #85 · GitHub
//voltron/discussions_fragments/discussion_layout" data-turbo-transient="true" />
Skip to content
Search or jump to...
Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...
-->
Search
Clear
Search syntax tips
Provide feedback
--><br>We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
Include my email address so I can be contacted
Cancel
Submit feedback
Saved searches
Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
-->
Name
Query
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Cancel
Create saved search
Sign in
//voltron/discussions_fragments/discussion_layout;ref_cta:Sign up;ref_loc:header logged out"}"<br>Sign up
Appearance settings
Resetting focus
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.<br>You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.<br>You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.
Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
rodriguezaa22ar-boop
atlas-trust-infrastructure
Public
Notifications<br>You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork
Star<br>14
Feedback wanted: Atlas proof receipts for critical digital actions
#85
Pinned
rodriguezaa22ar-boop
started this conversation in<br>General
Feedback wanted: Atlas proof receipts for critical digital actions
#85
rodriguezaa22ar-boop
Jun 4, 2026<br>·<br>1 comment
Return to top
Discussion options
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
{{title}}
Something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Quote reply
rodriguezaa22ar-boop
Jun 4, 2026
Maintainer
Hi everyone,
I’m building Atlas, a metadata-first proof/evidence system for critical digital actions.
The basic idea is simple: important actions like CI releases, approvals, AI-agent events, production-readiness checks, and privileged workflow changes should come with a receipt.
Atlas does not try to replace GitHub, CI/CD, scanners, approval tools, or business systems. Instead, it records and verifies the proof chain around them:
who requested the action
what capability or policy applied
whether approval was required
what evidence or artifact references were emitted
what commit, packet, or receipt contains the result
how another reviewer can replay or verify the proof
what the proof does not show
The goal is to reduce evidence-chasing and make reviews clearer without storing raw secrets, customer data, private logs, prompts, packet captures, or sensitive artifacts.
I’m looking for feedback on:
whether the proof-receipt model makes sense
whether the reviewer flow is understandable
where the docs feel confusing
what risks or blind spots I should explain better
what teams would need before trying this in a real workflow
A good starting point is the README and reviewer quickstart.
Thanks for taking a look. Any feedback helps.
Beta<br>Was this translation helpful?<br>Give feedback.
You must be logged in to vote
All reactions
Replies:
1 comment
Comment options
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
{{title}}
Something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Quote reply
tercanali07-ops
Jun 8, 2026
Yapay Zeka ajanlarının son durumu ile ilgili yayınladığım bir haberim var istersen sitemi inceleyerek görebilirsin. https://www.deepreadenigma.com/2026/06/yazlmc-programc-isi-bitti-mi-microsoft.html?m=1
Beta<br>Was this translation helpful?<br>Give feedback.
You must be logged in to vote
All reactions
0 replies
-->
Sign up for free<br>to join this conversation on GitHub .<br>Already have an account?<br>Sign in to comment
Category
💬
General
Labels
None yet
2 participants
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Select a reply
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Create a new saved reply
👍<br>reacted with thumbs up emoji
👎<br>reacted with thumbs down emoji
😄<br>reacted with laugh emoji
🎉<br>reacted with hooray emoji
😕<br>reacted with confused emoji
❤️<br>reacted with heart emoji
🚀<br>reacted with rocket emoji
👀<br>reacted with eyes emoji
You can’t perform that action at this time.