A lack of sex held back life’s diversity for millions of years | University of Cambridge
Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study at Cambridge
About the University
Research at Cambridge
Quick links
For Cambridge students
For staff
For alumni
For our<br>researchers
Business and<br>enterprise
Colleges &<br>departments
Give to Cambridge
Libraries
Museums & collections
Search site
Home
Study at Cambridge
Undergraduate
Undergraduate courses
Applying
Events and open days
Fees and finance
Postgraduate
Postgraduate courses
How to apply
Postgraduate events
Fees and funding
International<br>students
Continuing education
Executive and professional education
Courses in education
About the University
How the<br>University and Colleges work
Term dates and calendars
History
Map
Visiting the University
News
Annual reports
A global university
Equality and diversity
Events
Public engagement
Jobs
Give to Cambridge
Research at Cambridge
For staff
For Cambridge students
For alumni
For our researchers
Business and enterprise
Colleges & departments
Email & phone search
Give to Cambridge
Libraries
Museums & collections
A lack of sex held back life’s diversity for millions of years
The way that Earth’s first animals reproduced held back life’s diversity for millions of years, until stress and competition led to the development of sexual reproduction, which in turn accelerated the pace of evolution.
Researchers from the University of Cambridge studied fossils from the oldest-known animals on Earth, dating from 574 million years ago, and found that asexual reproduction slowed the pace of evolution to a crawl, since it limited competition between different groups.<br>Their results, reported in the journal Nature Ecology and Evolution, could help explain a longstanding puzzle in palaeontology: why animal life appeared on Earth but then barely changed for millions of years, before a second wave of diversification gave evolutionary progress a major boost.<br>After billions of years of microbial life, during the Ediacaran period, between 635 and 539 million years ago, life exploded in size and the first animals appeared. Some of these earliest animals, such as Fractofusus, could grow as tall as two metres, although most were much smaller.<br>These animals looked more like ferns than any animal we would recognise today: they do not appear to have mouths, organs or means of movement, so they are thought to have absorbed nutrients from the water around them. And like most Ediacaran life forms, they disappeared from the fossil record at the beginning of the Cambrian period 540 million years ago, making it difficult for scientists to link them to any modern life forms.<br>Researchers have previously determined that these early animals reproduced asexually, by sending out clones via stolons or runners, like modern strawberry plants. In the rich waters of the Ediacaran, they thrived.<br>“Life was pretty nice during the Ediacaran, so the need for sex was rather limited,” said lead author Dr Emily Mitchell from Cambridge’s Department of Zoology. “There was relatively little competition, so there was no real pressure to change anything.”<br>Mitchell and her co-author Professor Andrea Manica used a combination of laser scanning, spatial analysis and artificial intelligence to study fossils from Mistaken Point in Newfoundland, one of the world’s richest sources of fossils from the Ediacaran, to help determine why early animal evolution slowed down, and why it might have sped up again.<br>The researchers first showed that asexual, stolon-based reproduction limited competition, then built a computer model to simulate how early animal communities might behave under different reproductive strategies. They ran the model thousands of times while a simple neural network helped narrow down which simulations best matched the diversity patterns seen in the fossil record. This approach, known as Approximate Bayesian Computation, allowed the researchers to work backwards from the real data to estimate how far organisms spread and how strongly they competed for resources.<br>Using this method, the researchers showed that limited dispersal linked to asexual, runner-based reproduction could explain why early animal communities had relatively few species, and why a later shift toward wider dispersal and sexual reproduction coincided with a sudden burst of evolutionary diversity.<br>Competition and stress have been prime drivers of evolution for billions of years, but in the deep waters of the Ediacaran, asexual reproduction meant that competition was limited. “If you’re connected to your neighbour by these runners, then you’re sharing nutrients and you don’t need to compete with them,” said Manica.<br>However, as life in the Ediacaran slowly spread from the deep ocean to shallower waters, early animals faced more pressures: tides, storms, changing temperatures and nutrient levels all would have made life...