[2604.21950] Feedback Over Form: Why Execution Feedback Matters More Than Pipeline Topology in 1-3B Code Generation

-->

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2604.21950 (cs)

[Submitted on 23 Apr 2026]

Title:Feedback Over Form: Why Execution Feedback Matters More Than Pipeline Topology in 1-3B Code Generation

Authors:Charles Junichi McAndrews<br>View a PDF of the paper titled Feedback Over Form: Why Execution Feedback Matters More Than Pipeline Topology in 1-3B Code Generation, by Charles Junichi McAndrews

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Small language models (1-3B) are practical to run locally, but individually limited on harder code generation tasks. We ask whether composing them into pipelines can recover some of that lost capability. We study code generation pipelines built from 1-3B models with execution feedback, and use a NEAT-inspired evolutionary search to test whether more complex pipeline structure helps beyond a simple refinement loop. We evaluate on HumanEval (164 problems) and sanitized MBPP (427 problems), all with local inference on a single laptop. Self-refinement with execution feedback improves code generation by more than 4 standard deviations on both benchmarks. The gains are narrow in mechanism: refinement fixes many runtime errors (especially NameError and SyntaxError), but rarely fixes logic errors such as AssertionError. Within our tested general-purpose model pool, generator identity mattered less than refiner capability: a 1.5B generator paired with a 3B refiner matched a 3B model doing both roles. Early stopping is essential; without it, every iteration is net-negative. The code-specialized models outperform every general-purpose pipeline configuration, suggesting model specialization matters more than pipeline architecture. Preliminary text-only pipeline experiments without execution feedback did not show gains at this scale. In our constrained search space, evolutionary search mostly rediscovered the same simple generate-execute-refine loop we found manually, with no clearly significant gain from added topology. Single-evaluation fitness inflates results by 5-7 percent, selecting lucky genomes over good ones. On these benchmarks at 1-3B scale, execution feedback mattered more than added pipeline complexity in determining whether composition helped.

Comments:<br>17 pages main text, 2 page references, 3 figures. Code: this https URL

Subjects:

Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2604.21950 [cs.SE]

(or<br>arXiv:2604.21950v1 [cs.SE] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.21950

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history<br>From: Charles Junichi McAndrews [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:34:54 UTC (98 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Feedback Over Form: Why Execution Feedback Matters More Than Pipeline Topology in 1-3B Code Generation, by Charles Junichi McAndrews<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.SE

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-04

Change to browse by:

cs<br>cs.AI<br>cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper...