Canada parliament passes cybersecurity bill amid privacy concerns - JURIST - News
Search:
Search
NewsImage by M. Richter from Pixabay
The Canadian Senate on Thursday passed Bill C-8, introducing a mandatory cybersecurity framework designed to protect critical infrastructure across the country’s telecommunications, finance, energy and transportation sectors against emerging threats.<br>The legislation achieves its objectives by amending the existing Telecommunications Act and enacting the new Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act.<br>The amendments to the Telecommunications Act grant the Governor in Council and the Minister of Industry new authorities to actively secure national networks. These powers include the ability to issue binding administrative orders to major telecommunications service providers. Specifically, the government can prohibit the use of products from specified suppliers and mandate the removal of high-risk equipment from domestic networks. The bill also enforces strict regulatory compliance by introducing monetary penalties for non-compliant operators.<br>Concurrently, the Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act establishes a formal framework to safeguard critical operational systems and services that are vital to national security and public safety.<br>However, the legislation’s progression through the House of Commons and the Senate has drawn persistent concerns regarding user privacy. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada warned of several outstanding privacy risks, pointing out that the legal thresholds for exercising these new government powers remain too broad. The Commissioner also criticized the lack of a mandatory mechanism to notify their office of major cybersecurity breaches and highlighted inadequate minimum privacy standards for sharing information with foreign governments.<br>Echoing these concerns, the University of Toronto’s interdisciplinary research laboratory, Citizen Lab, formally submitted an expert assessment to the relevant standing committee, emphasizing that the legislation still lacks necessary operational safeguards.<br>Having successfully cleared its final reading, Bill C-8 is currently awaiting royal assent to officially pass into Canadian law.
GET OUR DAILY DIGEST
Email Address
Subscribe Key:
Subscribe
Latest DISPATCHES
Kenya dispatch: High Court strikes down law criminalizing consensual sex among teenagers
Kenya dispatch: High Court suspends US-backed Ebola quarantine facility
Latest COMMENTARY
The Economics of Adult Migration and Birthright Citizenship: Who Really Pays the Price?
by L. Ali Khan | Washburn University School of Law
Beyond Sovereignty: The Legal and Moral Case for Treating Hormuz as a Global Trust
by AmirAli Maleki
Latest FEATURES
The Legal Architecture of Reparations: A Conversation with Kwesi Pratt Jnr.
Beaten, Starved, Unbroken: An Interview with Ben Marmarelli, Lawyer to Marwan Barghouti, Palestine’s Nelson Mandela
THIS DAY @ LAW
US Supreme Court upheld discriminatory districting
On June 10, 1946, the US Supreme Court upheld uneven congressional districting plans in Colegrove v. Green. The case challenged an Illinois districting plan that concentrated voters into large districts in the center of the state and did not balance for population. The court reasoned that districting was a political question for the states to decide without judicial interference. This opinion was overturned less than 20 years later in Baker v. Carr, which set judicial standards for invoking political question doctrine.
Learn more about political question doctrine from Cornell Law School's Legal Information Institute.
League of Nations convened
On June 10, 1920, the League of Nations convened for the first time.
It was not formally dissolved until 1946. The United States was never a member. Learn more about the history of the League of Nations.
Home<br>Attributions<br>Disclaimer<br>Privacy Policy<br>Contact Us
Copyright © 2026, JURIST Legal News & Research Services, Inc.<br>JURISTnews is a collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh