Harness-Bench: Measuring Harness Effects Across Models

ZeljkoS1 pts0 comments

[2605.27922] Harness-Bench: Measuring Harness Effects across Models in Realistic Agent Workflows

-->

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2605.27922 (cs)

[Submitted on 27 May 2026]

Title:Harness-Bench: Measuring Harness Effects across Models in Realistic Agent Workflows

Authors:Yilun Yao, Xinyu Tan, Chao-Hsuan Liu, Yaoming Li, Zhengyang Wang, Wenhan Yu, Zhewen Tan, Yuxuan Tian, Guangxiang Zhao, Lin Sun, Xiangzheng Zhang, Tong Yang<br>View a PDF of the paper titled Harness-Bench: Measuring Harness Effects across Models in Realistic Agent Workflows, by Yilun Yao and 11 other authors

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:LLM agents are increasingly deployed as executable systems that use tools, modify workspaces, and produce concrete artifacts. In such workflows, performance depends not only on the base model, but also on the harness: the system layer that manages context, tools, state, constraints, permissions, tracing, and recovery. However, existing benchmarks typically abstract away execution, compare complete agent systems, or hold the harness fixed, making execution-layer variation difficult to study. We introduce Harness-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating configuration-level harness effects in realistic agent workflows. Harness-Bench evaluates representative harness configurations across multiple model backends under shared task environments, budgets, and evaluation protocols, while preserving each harness's native execution behavior. The benchmark contains 106 sandboxed offline tasks constructed from practical agent-use patterns and manually reviewed for realism, solvability, oracle-checkability, and integrity. Each run records final artifacts, execution traces, usage statistics, and validator outputs, enabling analysis beyond final completion. Across 5,194 execution trajectories, we observe substantial variation in completion, process quality, efficiency, and failure behavior across model-harness pairings. These results suggest that agent capability should be reported at the model-harness configuration level rather than attributed to the base model alone. Our analysis further identifies recurring execution-alignment failures, where plausible reasoning becomes decoupled from tool feedback, workspace state, evidence, or verifiable output contracts. Harness-Bench provides a reproducible foundation for diagnosing and improving reliable, efficient, and auditable agent execution stacks.

Comments:<br>16 pages, 4 figures, 11 tables. The first three authors contributed equally

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2605.27922 [cs.AI]

(or<br>arXiv:2605.27922v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27922

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history<br>From: Yilun Yao [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Wed, 27 May 2026 03:47:35 UTC (456 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Harness-Bench: Measuring Harness Effects across Models in Realistic Agent Workflows, by Yilun Yao and 11 other authors<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn...

harness toggle agent bench across arxiv

Related Articles