Invisible College - Wikipedia

Jump to content

Search

Search

Donate

Create account

Log in

Personal tools

Donate

Create account

Log in

Invisible College

10 languages

العربية<br>Català<br>Español<br>Français<br>Italiano<br>Latina<br>Português<br>Русский<br>Simple English<br>中文

Edit links

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Informal group of scholars, as in Royal Society of London's precursor groups

Not to be confused with Collegium Invisibile of Warsaw, founded 1995.

Emblematic image of a Rosicrucian College; illustration from Speculum sophicum Rhodo-stauroticum, a 1618 work by Theophilus Schweighardt. Frances Yates identifies this as the "Invisible College of the Rosy Cross".[1]<br>Invisible College is a term used to describe a non-public network of researchers operating in an informal way.[2][3][4] Originally used to describe the early association of the Enlightenment-era Royal Society of London, which consisted of a number of natural philosophers such as Robert Boyle and Christopher Wren,[5] the term has been of considerable interest to scholars since the 1960s with the research of Derek Price and Donald Beaver.[6] Research on this topic has focused closely on law schools and the sciences.[7][8]

Background<br>[edit]

The name historically originates from a group of individuals in the mid-seventeenth century who eventually formed the Royal Society of London. Prior to that, they met informally, separate from the more prominent groups associated with Wadham College (Oxford University) and Gresham College. They corresponded via letters to garner recognition for their work, establish precedence, and stay informed about others' research. Members of this early Royal Society of Scientists did not belong to a formal institution, thus they referred to themselves as an invisible college due to their "geographic closeness and regular meetings based on shared scientific interests".[4][9] In the current academic framework, the term has become less specific, and its meaning and interpretation have varied widely among different authors.[6] The term accrued currency for the exchanges of correspondence within the Republic of Letters.[10]

Connection with Robert Boyle and the Royal Society<br>[edit]

Detailed evidence<br>[edit]

In letters in 1646 and 1647, Boyle refers to "our invisible college" or "our philosophical college". The society's common theme was to acquire knowledge through experimental investigation.[11] Three dated letters are the basic documentary evidence: Boyle sent them to Isaac Marcombes (Boyle's former tutor and a Huguenot, who was then in Geneva), Francis Tallents who at that point was a fellow of Magdalene College, Cambridge,[12] and London-based Samuel Hartlib.[13]

Dorothy Stimson writes that "The work of the Royal Society in seventeenth century England is of such significance in the development of experimental science and in the recognition given this "new philosophy" that great importance is attached to any part of the life of that century which may help to explain the origins and growth of the Society." and that Comenius was in large part a big influence on this group.[14]

On the historical movement, Clay Shirky notes in his book Cognitive Surplus that:[15]

Much of the members’ practical work involved chemistry. They were strongly critical of the alchemists, their intellectual forebears, who for centuries had made only fitful progress. By contrast, the Invisible College put chemistry on a sound footing in a matter of a couple of decades, one of the most important intellectual transitions in the history of science. What did the Invisible College have that the alchemists didn’t? It wasn’t their tools—chemists and alchemists both started out with vials, braziers, and scales. Nor was it insight—no single figure suddenly advanced chemistry, as Newton did with physics. The Invisible College had one big advantage over the alchemists: they had one another.

The Hartlib Circle were a far-reaching group of correspondents linked to Hartlib, an intelligencer. They included Sir Cheney Culpeper and Benjamin Worsley who were interested, among other matters, in alchemy.[16] Worsley in 1646 was experimenting on saltpetre manufacture, and Charles Webster in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography argues that he was the "prime mover" of the Invisible College at this point: a network with aims and views close to those of the Hartlib Circle with which it overlapped.[17] Margery Purver concludes that the 1647 reference of "invisible college" was to the group around Hartlib concerned to lobby Parliament in favour of an "Office of Address" or centralised communication centre for the exchange of information.[13] Maddison suggests that the "Invisible College" might have comprised Worsley, John Dury and others with Boyle, who were interested in profiting from science (and possibly involving George Starkey).[18]

Richard S. Westfall distinguishes Hartlib's "Comenian circle" from other groups; and gives a list of "invisible college"...