No, everyone is not using AI for everything. - by yegg

Gabriel Weinberg

SubscribeSign in

No, everyone is not using AI for everything.<br>People are consuming AI like they eat meat: some are embracing it, some are limiting their use of it, and some are avoiding it altogether.

yegg<br>Jun 13, 2026

13

Share

Article voiceover<br>0:00

-10:24

Audio playback is not supported on your browser. Please upgrade.Last year around this time The New York Times Magazine ran an A.I. issue with an introduction titled “Everyone Is Using A.I. for Everything. Is That Bad?” It’s an edited transcript from the Hard Fork podcast, which I think assumes two things are true that are turning out to be false.<br>Once you’ve tried AI, you use it “for everything.” No, in fact most people who’ve tried it are just occasional AI users.

AI has gotten so good that despite any misgivings, “everyone is using A.I.” No, in fact large chunks of the population aren’t using AI at all.

(It isn’t really strictly defined in the article, but I’m taking AI to mean generative AI accessible via a chat interface.)<br>“Everyone is using AI for everything” is actually “Some people are using AI for some things”

Take Gen Z, where AI awareness is the highest: in the last year, even though AI has supposedly gotten a lot better, Gen Z AI adoption has all but stalled, with a meaningful percentage of the Gen Z population still using AI rarely, if at all.<br>Here’s Gallup’s year-over-year (2025/2026) breakdown:<br>79/81% use AI at least rarely

41/42% are anxious about AI

32/31% use AI only monthly/every few months

22/31% are angry about AI

21/19% never use AI

This tracks with Microsoft’s new United States AI Diffusion site, based on “anonymized, aggregated Microsoft telemetry.” Their associated blog reports “more than 30 percent of the US working-age population is using AI [meaning about 70% isn’t], an increase of 3 percentage points from the end of 2025 .” The underlying academic paper specifies that usage is defined as “engagement with major AI services including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Anthropic Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and others….with at least 90 minutes of usage time in a given month.”<br>The Microsoft data is brand new, and it mirrors another usage study from Datos from last year, also based on real-world usage data. The Datos study found similarly that, as of last June, only 21% of desktop devices visited “AI Tools” 10 or more times a month, 62% visited 0 times, and the remaining 17% in between .<br>Back on the survey side, a recent Searchlight Institute study found “58% report using or trying AI, specifically tools like ChatGPT or Claude, divided evenly between fairly regular users (30% use at least a few times a month) [roughly matching the Microsoft/Datos data] and more infrequent users (29% have used AI, but only once a month or less). ” And finally a new survey from The Argument finds “most Americans use AI once a week or less. ”

All of this triangulates to AI use in America at approximately one third actively using AI, one third occasionally using AI, and one third never using AI , with some movement depending on how you define those terms. In any case, this split is a far cry from “everyone is using AI for everything;” it’s much closer to “some people are using AI for some things.” AI use also hasn’t shifted that much in the past six months to a year. In fact, the only thing that has substantially changed is negative sentiment about AI has gone significantly up, for example the Gallup’s Gen Z poll reporting anger about AI jumping about 40% relative year over year.<br>Many people are holding back AI use because of real AI concerns and lack of perceived AI value

I think it is a reasonable conclusion to draw from all of this data that a significant percentage of the population is actively limiting their AI usage. The Searchlight study examines a big reason why: real concerns people have with AI. The top three concerns found are “AI will replace jobs and cause unemployment” (42%), "AI will violate people’s privacy” (35%), and “AI will spread misinformation and lies” (33%).

This sentiment also matches a strong desire for safety/privacy AI regulation. A solid majority thinks “the government should prioritize creating safety/privacy rules for AI, even if that means the U.S. develops AI more slowly than countries like China.”

Another big reason is skepticism in AI usefulness. SearchLight asked about a range of technologies and to say “whether you believe the overall impact of each technology on society is positive or negative.” AI only has an +8% net positive rating right now, right next to +7% for social media, which were only greater than crypto at -17%. Meanwhile cell phones, the internet, and solar energy are at +68%, +67%, and +65%, respectively.

The Argument study broke this down further, asking about specific societal benefits from AI, finding broad skepticism and concluding “people aren’t really buying the bullish case for AI that CEOs and boosters alike are...