The Demographic End of History - by Philip Walford

Morbid Curiosity

SubscribeSign in

The Demographic End of History<br>Birth rates aren’t falling because of morals or markets; the future has simply stopped being a place we can reach.

Philip Walford<br>Jun 16, 2026

Share

For more than two hundred years, writers and artists have imagined dystopias where the human race declines towards extinction. Byron was among the first, composing Darkness in the ashy, year-long twilight cast by Mount Tambora. The poem traverses a sort of Biblical hell-on-earth of crowned kings and gnashing teeth before pivoting to a future even more bleak:<br>Text within this block will maintain its original spacing when publishedThe world was void,<br>Text within this block will maintain its original spacing when publishedThe populous and the powerful was a lump,<br>Text within this block will maintain its original spacing when publishedSeasonless, herbless, treeless, manless, lifeless—<br>Text within this block will maintain its original spacing when publishedA lump of death—a chaos of hard clay.

Fittingly, Byron offers no explanation for his apocalypse. After all, he didn’t yet know that a volcano was the reason for Europe’s dark skies. But ten years later, Mary Shelley’s The Last Man set a pattern for this kind of story that has largely endured. The dystopia in her novel is caused by a plague, but since then, writers from H.G. Wells to P.D. James have shown it could just as easily be nuclear war, runaway technology or genetic engineering gone wrong. A mistake is made somewhere, a boundary crossed. Mankind’s fate is sealed, set on a downward track that eventually leaves no one left.<br>We appear to be on that trajectory now. With one crucial difference. Birth rates around the world have been falling since the 1950s, with the global Total Fertility Rate (the average number of children born to each woman) dropping from around 5 to 2.2 over the past 75 years. But unlike all previous contractions, there is no cataclysm to point to, no event that explains our doom. Of course, demographers have a name for this—the Demographic Transition—and mechanisms that explain how it happened: contraception, education, declining infant mortality and women entering the workforce.<br>What nobody knows is why it is still falling decades after most of those developments became commonplace.<br>Since the end of WWII, we have enjoyed unparalleled abundance; diseases once thought demonic are on the retreat; technology promises our imminent freedom from labour. And yet the birth-rate crash keeps gathering pace. At some point in the next decade, TFR will fall below the ‘replacement threshold’ of 2.1, and eventually, for the first time since the Black Death, the global population will decline rather than grow.

With very few exceptions (mostly environmentalists and nihilists), everyone agrees that this is a bad thing. Fewer children mean fewer taxpayers to prop up social services, and fewer spins on the fruit machine of crisis-solving genius. Something needs to be done. But as soon as discussion turns to the reason why this is happening, consensus vanishes like rain on lava. Summed up in partisan terms, the right sees it largely as a question of shirked individual obligation, the left of abdicated social responsibility. People are too selfish. Property is unaffordable. There are too many women in the workplace. Nobody believes in God anymore. Nobody believes in sin anymore. We’re insufficiently patriotic. Grandparents are taking too many vacations. Everyone has smartphones. Everything is too expensive.<br>This has led to a raft of proposed solutions that range from quaint to crazy: state-funded parental leave, baby bonuses, tax credits, and award ceremonies for the most fecund mothers complete with garlands, flowers and national recognition. One high-profile commentator recently proposed a cult of penis worship as the most viable solution. Phallic druidery aside, many of these suggestions sound plausible, addressing most of the economic and social objections that crop up whenever people are asked why they aren’t having more children. Unfortunately, when faced with reality, they fail a pretty basic test. They don’t fix the problem. Anywhere they have been tried they have stuttered and for the most part failed; the few that show some success tend to be short-lived and quickly reversed. TFR seems to be falling not because of fault lines in the economy or personal morality, but because of the collapse of something much larger, and much harder to repair.<br>One of the reasons declining birth rates are so confounding is that the issue shows up almost everywhere. There’s no neat dividing line between developed and developing world, or between devout and godless. Hungary and South Korea, the two poster-children for pronatalist policy intervention, sit on opposite sides of the political and cultural spectrum, and yet their results have been eerily similar. Hungary has spent more money on family...