Where the Light Falls, by Clare Bucknell

-->

July 2026 Issue

[Reviews]

Where the Light Falls

Who was Johannes Vermeer?

by Clare Bucknell ,

The Art of Painting, c. 1666–68, by Johannes Vermeer © KHM-Museumsverband. Courtesy Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

[Reviews]

Where the Light Falls

Who was Johannes Vermeer?

by Clare Bucknell ,

Adjust

Share

Discussed in this essay:

Vermeer: A Life Lost and Found, by Andrew Graham-Dixon. W. W. Norton.

416 pages. $45.

There’s an anecdote that crops up sooner or later in almost any book about Johannes Vermeer. In 1663, a French diplomat named Balthasar de Monconys traveled to the Netherlands. More than once, he visited the city of Delft. On his final visit, he noted in his diary, he made Vermeer’s acquaintance. He asked to see some of the artist’s work; Vermeer had none to show, he said, but he directed Monconys to the house of a baker who had bought one of his pictures. Monconys was astounded by the amount the baker had paid—six hundred livres! “I myself would have thought six pistoles [a tenth of that sum] too high a price.”

Those are the details. The question is what they mean. Some scholars claim that this well-traveled Frenchman’s interest in the painter must indicate that Vermeer was known to contemporary connoisseurs. Others argue that Monconys had no idea who Vermeer was and encountered him by chance, while on secret Jesuit business in the neighborhood. Then there is the fact that Vermeer couldn’t—or wouldn’t?—show him any of his paintings. Was he hiding them? Were they all at the house of his principal patron? If so, why not send Monconys there, rather than to a baker who owned a single work? And what about that enormous price of six hundred livres, three times the sum fetched by the most expensive of the artist’s pictures at auction thirty years later? Might the baker have been engaged in a quiet bit of price inflation on his behalf?

“It is a fairly negative fragment—‘no works to be seen’—but that is what we come to expect,” Anthony Bailey noted in his biography twenty-five years ago. It is the story of Vermeer in general, who must be the most famous artist known to us only through crumbs and scraps. Fewer than forty contemporaneous documents referring to Vermeer have been discovered across various archives, which scholars have used to sketch out the thin shape of a life.

This is how it goes. Vermeer was born in Delft in 1632. His family was not wealthy. His father had trained as a textile manufacturer, but by the time Johannes was born, he was an innkeeper with an art-dealing business on the side. His mother, who came from a somewhat shady family (her father had been part of a coin-forging group whose ringleaders were arrested and beheaded), helped run the inn; his sister was twelve years older. In 1653, Vermeer married Catharina Bolnes, the daughter of Reynier Bolnes, a brickmaker, and Maria Thins, a wealthy Catholic heiress who owned a large house in an area of town known as Papists’ Corner. The same year, he enrolled as a master painter in the Delft artists’ guild. The modest number of his pictures that survive—thirty-seven, if you include two contested attributions—suggests that he worked slowly, completing on average two or three per year.

Vermeer and Catharina both came from small families, but they seem to have wanted a very big one; they had fifteen children, eleven of whom survived infancy. By 1660, the family had moved into Maria Thins’s house. Vermeer painted, carried on his father’s art-dealing business, and served in the city’s militia. Toward the end of the decade, his production began to slow and then dried up altogether. In 1675, he died suddenly at the age of forty-three, of unknown causes.

Over the years, biographers and art historians have circled the same questions. Did he serve a formal apprenticeship and if so, with whom? Could it have been with the talented Carel Fabritius in Delft? Or might he have gone to a master in Utrecht, with its strong Caravaggesque tradition? Or directly to the source, Rome? If there was no money to send him anywhere (the inn that his father had purchased in 1641 was mortgaged to the hilt), is it plausible that he taught himself or had casual lessons with a local painter in exchange for beer or board? What were his religious affiliations? Maria Thins likely wasn’t thrilled to have a Protestant for a son-in-law, but we can’t be sure whether he had to convert to Catholicism to be accepted into the family, or how committed he was to his new faith if he did.

Then there is the question of money. Scholars largely agree that one wealthy Delft couple, the brewing heir Pieter Claesz van Ruijven and his wife, Maria de Knuijt, were his primary patrons. An inventory made of their daughter’s possessions in 1683 suggests that they must have owned the great majority of the pictures that Vermeer produced from the late 1650s onward, and that they may have had a long-term arrangement with him, likely...