[2606.00438] GitHub Copilot and Developer Productivity: An Observational Dose-Response Analysis

-->

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2606.00438 (cs)

[Submitted on 30 May 2026]

Title:GitHub Copilot and Developer Productivity: An Observational Dose-Response Analysis

Authors:Alex Heilman, Alex Kyllo, Emerson Murphy-Hill<br>View a PDF of the paper titled GitHub Copilot and Developer Productivity: An Observational Dose-Response Analysis, by Alex Heilman and 2 other authors

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Does GitHub Copilot (GHCP) make engineers more productive, or do the engineers who use it more differ from those who use it less? And even within a single engineer, are GHCP-heavy weeks just busy weeks in which more of everything gets done? We study these questions using 43 weeks of data from 16,223 software engineers across Microsoft's Cloud+AI organization. Engineer fixed effects address the first concern by comparing each engineer against themselves rather than against other engineers, eliminating time-invariant differences in skill, role, and team. Active coding time and browser time then enter a Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood model with two-way fixed effects to address the harder, within-engineer confound: that GHCP-heavy weeks coincide with high-effort weeks. This defines our estimand as an efficiency effect: more pull requests completed at equivalent levels of coding time. Engineers are estimated to complete 40.5% more PRs in their highest GHCP usage weeks relative to their zero-usage weeks, holding measured development effort constant. The gradient is monotonic with diminishing returns at high intensity. Seven robustness and falsification tests target the remaining plausible alternative explanations (non-coding AI engagement, team-level shocks, within-week task reallocation, cross-week contamination, PR slicing into smaller units, shifts toward easier task types, and sensitivity to how the treatment is operationalized). Under an explicitly stated conditional-independence assumption, the within-engineer design estimates a tool-specific efficiency effect that is consistent with all seven robustness tests.

Comments:<br>9 pages, 10 figures, 1 table

Subjects:

Software Engineering (cs.SE)

ACM classes:<br>D.2.6; D.2.8; D.2.9

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2606.00438 [cs.SE]

(or<br>arXiv:2606.00438v1 [cs.SE] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.00438

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history<br>From: Alex Heilman [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Sat, 30 May 2026 00:09:51 UTC (1,354 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled GitHub Copilot and Developer Productivity: An Observational Dose-Response Analysis, by Alex Heilman and 2 other authors<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.SE

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |<br>Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)