The Lego Natural History Museum, and the question of scale | Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week
Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week
SV-POW! … All sauropod vertebrae, except when we're talking about Open Access. ISSN 3033-3695
The Lego Natural History Museum, and the question of scale
May 5, 2026
For my birthday this year, my wife bought me the newish Lego kit Natural History Museum 10326. (Well: actually she bought me a Chinese knock-off for 1/3 the price, but that’s not the point.) It’s a lovely kit and I had a great time building it.
One of the exhibits that you build for the museum is a sauropod skeleton — recognizably a brachiosaur. But as previously documented on this blog, I also have a much larger Lego brachiosaur, built from the piece of the kit Dinosaur Fossils 21320. (That one was also a present from Fiona!)
Here they are, side by side.
So which brachiosaur is more accurately to scale?
Lego is often considered to be in 42:1 scale, based on minifigure height of about 4 cm relative to a typical adult human height of about 1.68 m. (5 feet 6 inches).
I measured the big brachiosaur at 37 cm high from the top of its plinth to the top of the head. At 42:1 scale, that’s 15.54 m. The smaller one is 15 cm tall from plinth to head, which at 42:1 scale is 6.30 m.
The real Giraffatitan mount in the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin is 13.27 m tall (Taylor and Wedel 2013: caption to figure 1). That means that the larger of the two Lego models is much closer to being the right size, relative to the minifigs, than the small one is.
But wait: famously, the Giraffatitan fibula HMN XV2 is 134 cm long compared with 119 cm for the fibula of HMN SII (= MB.R.2181, the mounted specimen) (Janensch 1961: table 16). That’s 1.126 times as long, which indicates it belonged to an animal that stood 13.27 x 1.126 = 14.94 m tall.
That’s 96% the scaled size of the Lego Giraffatitan — which, given the hand-waving involved in the various scalings here, is as near to identical as makes no difference.
In conclusion, m’lud, the large Lego Giraffatitan in the photo above is almost exactly the right size for the largest known individual of that genus, relative to the minifigs and indeed the actual museum.
References
Janensch, Werner. 1961. Die Gliedmaszen und Gliedmaszengurtel der Sauropoden der Tendaguru-Schichten. Palaeontographica, suppl. 7(3) :177-235.
Taylor, Michael P., and Mathew J. Wedel. 2013c. The effect of intervertebral cartilage on neutral posture and range of motion in the necks of sauropod dinosaurs. PLOS ONE 8(10) :e78214. 17 pages. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078214
doi:10.59350/netrb-zbm84
Share this:
Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)<br>Facebook
Share on Reddit (Opens in new window)<br>Reddit
Share on X (Opens in new window)
Like Loading...
Related
Posted by Mike Taylor
Filed in brachiosaurids, Giraffatitan, Lego, size
5 Comments »
5 Responses to "The Lego Natural History Museum, and the question of scale"
Michael Traynor Says:
May 5, 2026 at 9:16 pm
I could not have imagined you’d have a ‘lego’ sauropod and not check it for proper scaling.
Definitely NOT Dilophosaurus Says:
May 6, 2026 at 3:49 pm
I got this one recently too! It was very fun to build. My solution to the issue of scale was to just pretend the skeleton is Europasaurus.
Mike Taylor Says:
May 6, 2026 at 4:01 pm
A bit too big for Europasaurus, unfortunately!
llewelly Says:
May 7, 2026 at 2:03 am
interestingly, Magyarosaurus and Saltasaurus seem too small, if one goes by wikipedia sizes. Camarasaurus lentus is too big. And I’m wandering further and further away from Brachiosaurus. How about Cedarosaurus? Still too big, but at least it’s a Brachiosaurid.
Definitely NOT Dilophosaurus Says:
May 8, 2026 at 1:56 am
Hmm, perhaps the Abydosaurus holotype?
Leave a comment
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
" Upcoming public talks about dinosaurs at the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History
An even earlier life restoration of a sauropod (1885) "
Support SV-POW!
Search
Search for:
Recent Posts
My adventures with Tri-bear-atops
Genuinely, my all-time favourite image: Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis
Revisiting Aquilops and Pentaceratops at the Sam Noble Museum
Where did the One of our Dinosaurs is Missing dinosaur come from?
Curiousiday at the Sam Noble Museum: Sauroposeidon, Apatosaurus, Aquilops, and more
Recent Comments
llewelly on My adventures with Tri-be…llewelly on My adventures with Tri-be…Mike Taylor on Genuinely, my all-time favouri…LeeB on Genuinely, my all-time favouri…Mike Taylor on Genuinely, my all-time favouri…
Pages
About SV-POW!
What they’re saying about SV-POW!
Tutorials
The Shiny Digital Future
Things to Make and Do
Necks Lie: the complete story
Videos by SV-POW!sketeers
Human anatomy study materials
Supersaurus, Ultrasaurus and Dystylosaurus in the 21st Century
Your noun is adjective
How adjective was taxon?
Engaging with the...