NHTSA investigating alleged Tesla Autopilot crash that killed woman in her home - Ars Technica
Skip to content
AI
Biz & IT
Cars
Culture
Gaming
Health
Policy
Science
Security
Space
Tech
Forum
Subscribe
Story text
Size
Small<br>Standard<br>Large
Width
Standard<br>Wide
Links
Standard<br>Orange
* Subscribers only
Learn more
Pin to story
Theme
Search
Sign In
Sign in dialog...
Text<br>settings
Story text
Size
Small<br>Standard<br>Large
Width
Standard<br>Wide
Links
Standard<br>Orange
* Subscribers only
Learn more
Minimize to nav
An elderly Texas woman tragically died Friday after a man who told police he was relying on his Tesla Model 3’s automated driver-assistance mode lost control and crashed his car into her family’s home.
In a statement, the Harris County Sheriff’s Office confirmed to Ars that Michael Butler said that “he was operating with an automated driving-assistance system engaged at the time of the crash.” Police are currently investigating whether the autopilot feature in any way caused the crash but confirmed that Butler was not intoxicated and is cooperating, partly by helping cops understand how Tesla’s Autopilot feature works.
“Butler failed to drive in a single lane, left the roadway, and struck the residence” at a “high rate of speed,” the sheriff’s office said.
It remains unclear how fast the car was going, but The New York Times shared a disturbing doorbell camera video of the crash showing the moment when the Tesla plowed through the brick home’s front. On Facebook, the Office of Constable Terry Allbritton shared photos showing the destruction to the home.
Martha Avila, 76, was standing in the front room of the house, where she lived with her daughter, son-in-law, and three young grandkids. Her daughter, Jennifer Barbour, told a local news outlet that no one else was hurt. The family remains “devastated” by the loss, with Barbour emphasizing that Avila was on no medications and in otherwise good health when she passed suddenly from her injuries. She thought her mother might live to 100, the way her grandmother did, she said, and feels Avila was robbed of significant time with her grandkids.
“She didn’t deserve to go that way,” Barbour said.
The family is in mourning while living in a hotel and waiting for answers, stuck in a state of uncertainty over whether the Tesla or the driver is to blame.
“I don’t know if it’s his fault or the car’s fault or what really happened,” Barbour said. “I’ve never seen a car go that fast.”
Tesla did not immediately respond to Ars’ request to comment. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration told Ars it is launching a special crash investigation after this accident.
Tesla claims Autopilot saves lives
Tesla’s Autopilot feature is popular, but it cannot be fully trusted, with the owner’s manual reminding drivers that “they should keep their hands on the wheel and take over if anything goes wrong,” the Times noted.
However, Tesla’s marketing often sends a mixed message, critics think. As recently as May, Tesla’s X account posted an ad showing drivers with their hands off the wheel, goofing off while waving their fingers in the air or sipping a hot coffee from a ceramic mug with two hands. The day after Butler’s crash, the Tesla X account reposted a gushing comment from a Tesla fan who shared a pic of himself taking a photo of a sunset while driving. His caption claimed that Tesla’s technology “is both magical and life changing, relaxing and maybe even lifesaving!”
For years, Tesla has claimed that automated self-driving features will make roads safer by eliminating human errors that commonly cause crashes. And under the Trump administration, Tesla seems best positioned to rapidly advance its technology and get more cars on the road with fewer human controls and without regulatory delays.
Currently, the company is pushing for the NHTSA to relax two rules.
One proposed rule change would allow automated vehicle (AV) makers like Tesla to remove displays that let drivers view transmission shift positions. In support, Tesla claimed that automated driving systems (ADS) make such displays obsolete because humans don’t need this information, but Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety warned that “it is critically important that passengers of a vehicle operated by an ADS can determine if the vehicle is in the proper gear before exiting or entering the vehicle.” According to Advocates, NHTSA has shown no research proving that the update would improve road safety.
The other rule change follows similar logic: NHTSA proposed that AVs relying on ADS don’t need windshield wipers or defogging controls for humans to operate. As Tesla commented, “there is no safety need” because the ADS relies on cameras to operate, “not transparency of the windshield zones.”
If Tesla gets its way, NHTSA would approve that rule change not just for smaller vehicles but also for mid-sized and large SUVs. However, Advocates are recommending that NHTSA instead drop...