EU Member States (and Google) suddenly want to keep cookie banners!
Skip to main content
en
de
bg
cs
el
es
fi
fr
hu
it
nl
pl
sk
EU Member States (and Google) suddenly want to keep cookie banners!
23 June 2026
For years, users and many companies have been complaining about cookie banners. Even though this understandable frustration is mostly caused by misleading dark patterns used by the industry, these banners have become the symbol of what is perceived as excessive EU regulation. As part of the ‘Digital Omnibus’ , the European Commission now finally wanted to get rid of cookie banners and replace them with an automated signal. However, Google and some of the very EU Member States that are actually calling on the EU to “simplify” and “cut red tape” – including Germany and France, for example – are now standing in the way. In the Council’s latest position paper of 18 June, the plan to abolish the cookie banner has been scrapped. This baffling outcome is likely to continue to cost European users a great deal of hassle, frustration and billions of clicks per year.
Proposal and reasoning of the European Commission (see Article 88b)<br>Council position of 18 June (published by Politico)<br>Google’s lobbying paper against Article 88b<br>Mlex report on Poland's position<br>Digital Omnibus background by noyb<br>“Dark patterns” and annoyance until the right result. In Europe, users cannot simply be tracked. Both online and offline, there is a fundamental right to data protection – including on Meta’s or Google’s platforms, as well as on websites full of tracking adverts. Companies must therefore ask each individual for their consent – or simply leave them in peace. This is done via so-called cookie banners, whereby consent is not only sought for cookies, but usually also for the sharing of data with often thousands of third-party companies. Users should actually have the option here to consent only if they wish to be tracked online of their own free will. Depending on the study, only around 3–10% of people want this. However, through so-called dark patterns (e.g. hidden ‘No’ buttons or pre-ticked consent boxes), the tracking industry achieves consent rates of up to 90%.<br>With more than 450 million people in the EU, this farce generates several billion (!) clicks a year, causes frustration and is a complete waste of time for consumers – whilst tech giants and the tracking industry rake in billions in profits through “voluntary” tracking. At the same time, it is becoming increasingly clear that the massive harvesting of personal data also poses risks to security and democracy.<br>Max Schrems: “Cookie banners are not an invention of data protection, but of the tracking industry. Without consent, there is no snooping online. Now there are fears that a simpler way of saying ‘yes’ or ‘no’ will result in a loss of revenue for Google and the like. That is why the tracking industry is currently lobbying as hard as it can to keep the cookie banner. Clearly, it wants to retain the ability to directly manipulate users’ choices.”<br>The EU's proposal: an automatic signal. In autumn 2025, the European Commission proposed replacing cookie banners with an automated signal that would communicate cookie consent preferences between the device, the user and websites. Even in California – the home state of most tech companies – a similar solution is already in place. Various proposals adapted to EU law have also been around for some time. The EU proposal is actually significantly less radical than the laws in the US because it still allows for consent to be given on a per-website basis. Specifically, the newly proposed Article 88b GDPR would have provided the solution and was a simple example of how reducing red tape can succeed whilst simultaneously benefiting consumers and fair businesses.<br>Max Schrems: “Browsers already automatically communicate which language I prefer. It’s just as easy to indicate digitally whether you want to be tracked. Technically, this is straightforward and is even enshrined in law in some US states. There are actually a number of technical solutions that could be introduced tomorrow. Europe is lagging completely behind with these antiquated banners. Absurdly, however, Google and the tracking industry want to make it as difficult as possible for people.”<br>The “Google Paper” and an avalanche of misinformation. However, a secret lobbying paper from Google has thrown a spanner in the works for the European Commission. Using completely far-fetched figures, it argues that without cookie banners, all online advertising would come to a standstill. Google is exaggerating wildly here and assumes there is a central ‘kill switch’ for all advertising. Yet the European Commission has explicitly made it clear that consent should still be possible on a per-website and per-purpose basis. It would therefore be possible to grant consent to quality media outlets in particular – and to withhold it from Google, Meta and the like....