In Retrospect: Science – The Endless Frontier

teleforce1 pts0 comments

In Retrospect: Science — The Endless Frontier | Nature

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain<br>the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in<br>Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles<br>and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Subjects

Policy<br>Publishing

Vannevar Bush's pivotal report that marked the beginning of modern science policy catapulted the phrase 'basic research' into popular usage, explains Roger Pielke Jr.

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

ISRIA statement: ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessment

Paula Adam<br>, Pavel V. Ovseiko<br>… Heidi Chorzempa

Health Research Policy and Systems<br>Open Access<br>08 February 2018

Access options

Access through your institution

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 52 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.83 per issue

Learn more

Buy this article<br>Purchase on SpringerLink<br>Instant access to the full article PDF.<br>USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Author information<br>Authors and Affiliations<br>Roger Pielke Jr is at the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA. pielke@colorado.edu,<br>Roger Pielke Jr

AuthorsRoger Pielke JrView author publications<br>Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions<br>Reprints and permissions

About this article<br>Cite this article<br>Pielke, R. In Retrospect: Science — The Endless Frontier.<br>Nature 466 , 922–923 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/466922a<br>Download citation<br>Published: 18 August 2010

Issue date: 19 August 2010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/466922a

Share this article<br>Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:<br>Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy shareable link to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Before translational medicine: laboratory-clinic relations

Michael Worboys<br>Carsten Timmermann<br>Elizabeth Toon

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences (2021)

Eco-system mapping of techno-science linkages at the level of scholarly journals and fields

Xiaozan Lyu<br>Ping Zhou<br>Loet Leydesdorff

Scientometrics (2020)

ISRIA statement: ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessment

Paula Adam<br>Pavel V. Ovseiko<br>Heidi Chorzempa

Health Research Policy and Systems (2018)

Basic research: goddess and cow

Rodney W. Nichols

Nature (2010)

Basic research: bizarre but essential

Jim Woodgett

Nature (2010)

Comments

Commenting on this article is now closed.

Jim Woodgett 18 August 2010, 15:49

Using terminology to try to satisfy both the political masters and the research endeavour can be risky. Part of the reduction in usage of the term basic research is likely due to the emergence of translational research, as in the sector that converts new knowledge into practical use. As a consequence and reaction, basic scientists have popularized the term "discovery research". Yet, the fact remains that all types of research are important. It's a pipeline which, when effective, acts as a well-spring of ideas that broaden knowledge that, occasionally, sprouts incredibly useful applications that generate wealth that helps support more investment in discovery. This process has been examined to death but by its very nature is unpredictable. All we can do is ensure that the best quality is achieved at every level and that we do not inadvertently limit the resources and ideas of those who ultimately practice this bizarre but essential driver of progress.

Robert Cook-Deegan 19 August 2010, 16:06

Roger,<br>Really nice, concise summary of a lot of history relevant to science policy.

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

Advertisement

Search

Search articles by subject, keyword or author

Show results from

All journals<br>This journal

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Explore articles by subject

Find a job

Guide to authors

Editorial policies

Close banner

Close

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Email address

Sign up

I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy.

Close banner

Close

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.<br>Sign up for Nature Briefing

research nature science access article policy

Related Articles