GitHub - Octember/stupify: anti-slop code reviewer · GitHub
/" data-turbo-transient="true" />
Skip to content
Search or jump to...
Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...
-->
Search
Clear
Search syntax tips
Provide feedback
--><br>We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
Include my email address so I can be contacted
Cancel
Submit feedback
Saved searches
Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
-->
Name
Query
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Cancel
Create saved search
Sign in
/;ref_cta:Sign up;ref_loc:header logged out"}"<br>Sign up
Appearance settings
Resetting focus
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.<br>You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.<br>You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.
Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Octember
stupify
Public
Notifications<br>You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork
Star
main
BranchesTags
Go to file
CodeOpen more actions menu
Folders and files<br>NameNameLast commit message<br>Last commit date<br>Latest commit
History<br>232 Commits<br>232 Commits
.github/workflows
.github/workflows
.review
.review
bin
bin
docs
docs
packages
packages
packs
packs
site
site
src
src
.gitignore
.gitignore
AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md
LICENSE
LICENSE
README.md
README.md
bun.lock
bun.lock
package.json
package.json
tsconfig.json
tsconfig.json
View all files
Repository files navigation
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as<br>cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
Kernighan's Law
stupify
AI agents are rats in a maze. They reach for what they know. And unless you show them better, what they know is slop: most software is garbage, and they'll happily imitate it.
actual issues, tells the coding agent exactly how + what to fix more catches, on real PRs →
What you get
Your taste, not the model's. Code is judged against a CORPUS.md: a taste pack ("code like dtolnay / DHH / antirez …") or your own best files
On your personal Codex plan. stupify reviews with Codex, running on the $20-$200/month plan. API usage is roughly 50x more expensive, enjoy the subsidized tokens while they last
Slop, named. Code review is cheap. Taste is expensive. Codify the goodies, let the LLM pattern match
Add the reviewer
npx @stupify/cli
┌ stupify<br>◇ using integration acme-widgets<br>◇ VM stupify-acme-widgets created<br>└ stupify is provisioned for acme/widgets 👀
stupify rides on exe.dev with no keys or servers to run. Setup takes about two minutes and doesn't require payment.
# provision for a specific repo<br>npx @stupify/cli setup # run the reviewer on this machine instead of a VM<br>npx @stupify/cli status # show the latest sweep as a workflow<br>ssh exe.dev rm stupify-- # tear it down">npx @stupify/cli owner/repo> # provision for a specific repo<br>npx @stupify/cli setup # run the reviewer on this machine instead of a VM<br>npx @stupify/cli status # show the latest sweep as a workflow<br>ssh exe.dev rm stupify-owner>-repo> # tear it down
Every live sweep also posts a GitHub commit status named stupify/review on the PR head commit: pending while<br>queued/running, success when reviewed or policy-skipped, failure when stupify posts findings, and error when the<br>reviewer itself failed. Set GITHUB_STATUS=0 in ~/.stupify/config.env to turn that off, or<br>GITHUB_STATUS_CONTEXT=your/context to rename it.
Connect your accounts
The reviews run on Codex. On exe.dev that's a keyless LLM integration : it fronts your ChatGPT/Codex plan, so<br>the VM holds no API key and your plan is billed instead. Link one once at exe.dev/integrations<br>and provisioning attaches it for you
Taste packs
Don't have a corpus yet? Borrow one. Pick a programmer whose code you'd point a new hire at and review and write like them, or compose several:
dtolnay · DHH · antirez ·<br>Sindre Sorhus · Rich Harris ·<br>zod · Mitchell Hashimoto ·<br>Tanner Linsley · Simon Willison ·<br>devshorts · Jarred Sumner · browse all →
Each pack is concrete principles plus commit-pinned exemplar files. Or bring your own : point stupify at the<br>files you wish all your code looked like, and it scaffolds a .review/ in your repo:
npx @stupify/cli init src/best.ts src/clean-service.ts # inlines them; you add one line of "why" each
License
MIT © Noah Lindner. Built by the team at Bevyl. stupif.ai, read it "stupify". PRs welcome, it'll review them 😈
About
anti-slop code reviewer
stupif.ai
Resources
Readme
License
MIT license
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Activity
Stars
star
Watchers
watching
Forks
forks
Report repository
Releases<br>17
v0.4.4 — fix upgrade ssh PATH
Latest
Jun 21, 2026
+ 16 releases
Packages
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributors
Uh oh!
There was an error...