China overtakes USA with fastest Top500 supercomputer: 2.2 Exaflops | heise online
heise+ entdecken
SuchenAbo
Suchen
Alle Magazine im Browser lesen<br>AnzeigeSpecial: Collaboration im KI-Zeitalter
Newsletter<br>heise-Bot<br>Push-Nachrichten
${lead}
${lead}
${content}
${content}
${content}
${content}
Anzeige<br>Special: Collaboration im KI-Zeitalter
Advertisement
Advertisement
Continue after ad
The 67th list of the fastest supercomputers, also known as Top500, has it all once again. Now, a Chinese native system is the first supercomputer to break the prestigious mark of 2 trillion calculations per second (2 EFlops) in the High Performance Linpack (HPL) benchmark. This measures the computing power in solving huge linear equation systems with double-precision floating-point accuracy (FP64). While export restrictions on US hardware have posed some challenges for China, they have ultimately not hindered it permanently.
A year ago, the Jupiter Booster from Jülich was one of the highlights as the fastest European system and later as the first European Exascale system. Exascale systems are supercomputers that can achieve at least one trillion (1018) calculations per second in HPL.
Also new in the Top 10 of the list is a second commercial system from the Italian oil and energy group Eni in sixth place. The Finnish LUMI and the Italian Leonardo have fallen out of the Top 10 list.
In total, 44 new systems with an average of 91 PFlops and a total of 3994 PFlops made it into the 67th Top500 list. The new leader from China thus contributes more than half of the new computing power. If you want to try your luck yourself, for entry at rank 500, your PC needs more than 2661.56 TFlops.
Much Ado About Nothing
After China had become one of the leading countries on the Top500 list, it stopped publishing figures for its supercomputers from 2019 onwards, partly due to US export restrictions. Before that, the Sunway TaihuLight in 2017 was the last Chinese system at the Top500 top spot. However, it was an open secret that several Exascale systems were already running in China.
Continue after ad
Configuration of the LX2 processor with ARMv9 cores of the Chinese supercomputer Lineshine.
(Image: NSCCSZ)
The new system is called LineShine and was already presented in April 2026. However, concrete performance data for the machine, also known as Ling Chen or Ling Shen (灵晟), was missing.
Lineshine relies entirely on Chinese hardware developments. The platform is called LingKun and does not use accelerators, which eight of the other Top10 systems use. The computing power comes from Lineshine-LX2 processors with ARMv9 architecture, each with 304 cores running at 1.55 Gigahertz. They are strongly based on the Fujitsu A64FX of the Japanese supercomputer Fugaku, with an integrated interconnect called LinqQi and bundled High Bandwidth Memory (HBM). Like Fugaku's ARM cores, the LX2's cores have the ARM vector extension SVE but also Scalable Matrix Extensions (SME).
In total, 45,360 LX2 processors with a combined 13,789,440 cores ran in the HPL benchmark. Their theoretical computing power of 2.736 EFLops is just under that of the previous leader, El Capitan (2.821 EFlops), but Lineshine manages to translate the raw power into performance slightly better. The proprietary interconnect called LingQi delivers 1.6 Tbit/s (200 MByte/s) per CPU, and the Linux derivative Kylin OS runs as the operating system.
Not only in HPL but also in the more memory- and interconnect-intensive HP Conjugate Gradient (HPCG), Lineshine climbs to the top spot, reaching 22 PFlops. Only in HPL-MxP, where calculations are performed in mixed precision friendly to AI accelerators, it falls short. At 7.92 EFlops, Lineshine only ranks 4th, as in CPU-only systems like Lineshine, the speed gain from reduced precision is typically lower than in supercomputers whose computing power is largely provided by accelerators.
67th Top500 Supercomputer List (June 2026): Top 10
Rank
Name
Country
CPU Type
Accelerator
RMax*
Efficiency
Lineshine (Ling Cheng)
China
LX2
2198 PFlops
52.1 GFlops/W
El Capitan
USA
MI300A
AMD Instinct MI300A
1809 PFlops
60.9 GFlops/W
Frontier
USA
Epyc
AMD Instinct MI 250X
1353 PFlops
55.0 GFlops/W
Aurora
USA
Xeon
Intel Xeon GPU Max
1012 PFlops
26.2 GFlops/W
Jupiter Booster
Germany
GH200
Nvidia GH200
1000 PFlops
63.3 GFlops/W
Eni HPC7
Italy
Epyc
AMD Instinct MI300A
572 PFlops
65.4 GFlops/W
Eagle (MS Azure)
USA
Xeon
Nvidia H100
561 PFlops
n.a.
Eni HPC6
Italy
Epyc
AMD Instinct MI 250X
478 PFlops
56.5 GFlops/W
Fugaku
Japan
A64FX
442 PFlops
15.4 GFlops/W
10
Alps
Switzerland
GH200
Nvidia GH200
435 PFlops
61.1 GFlops/W
*RMax is the floating-point performance (FP64) measured by Linpack
Getting Greener?
In the Top 10 of the Green500, the list of the most efficient supercomputers, nothing has changed. Around 73.3 GFlops per watt is still the best that systems can achieve in optimized runs....