The AI Data Centre Legal Case That Could Eradicate Civil Rights | MisalignedSitemapOpen in appSign up<br>Sign in

Medium Logo

Get app<br>Write

Search

Sign up<br>Sign in

Mastodon

Misaligned

Journal and magazine on ethics in AI, technology, data and science.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Featured

The AI Data Centre Legal Case That Could Eradicate Civil Rights

A lawsuit that at first was a conflict over clean air is turning into a fight over civil rights. And the Trump administration has teams up with Elon Musk’s SpaceX to challenge a fundamental right of US citizens.

Wolfgang Hauptfleisch

9 min read·<br>Just now

Listen

Share

In April 2026, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the civil rights organisation formed in 1909 that once had Thurgood Marshall fighting against segregation, filed a lawsuit against SpaceX/xAI’s data centres in Memphis, Tennessee over alleged unpermitted use of gas turbines.<br>What could have been a simple case about air pollution has now , after the involvement of the Trump administration, turned into a fight over the right to sue the industry at all. The outcome of this case could have severe implications not only for environmental law, but also for the enforcement of the Civil Rights Act.<br>Background<br>Since 2025, Elon Musk’s xAI (now part of SpaceX) has been building its AI data centres in Memphis Tennessee. However, as many other data centre projects xAI found it challenging to connect the data centre to the power grid and therefore opted for the solution to essentially build their own power plant in the form of giant gas turbines.<br>Those gas turbines emit NOx (shorthand for nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide), and a lot of it. SpaceX did however not seek a permit to operate them, claiming that being a “temporary installation”, no permit was required, facts that the NAACP disputes:<br>“Move fast and break things” is the unofficial motto of the tech industry. As the motto promises, artificial intelligence company Defendant X.AI Corp. (“xAI”) and its subsidiaries broke Clean Air Act requirements that protect public health when rushing to build gas power plants for their “Colossus” data centers in the greater Memphis area. […] Indeed, xAI and its subsidiaries have tried to outrun the Clean Air Act by repeatedly building gas power plants for these data centers — in communities in the greater Memphis area with significant Black populations — without obtaining mandatory permits. (NAACP complaint)

NAACP lays out that the pollution emitted by the gas turbines is harmful to the population in the area, not limited to the state of Tennessee.<br>The Colossus Gas Plant emits significant amounts of harmful pollutants,<br>including nitrogen oxides (“NOx ”) and formaldehyde, which are tied to increases in asthma, respiratory diseases, heart problems, and certain cancers in persons exposed to them. These emissions do not stop at the Mississippi state line; Tennessee residents are also exposed. (NAACP complaint)

To demonstrate the scale of emissions, NAACP provides a comparison of the NOx emissions by SpaceX with other polluters in the area:<br>Press enter or click to view image in full size

Source: NAACP complaintThe NAACP represents mostly black neighbourhoods, which are located right across the border in Mississippi, and, according to the NAACP filing, are especially affected by the emissions.<br>Tens of thousands of people, including members of Plaintiffs NAACP and<br>NAACP Mississippi State Conference (“NAACP MS”), live, worship, study and work in the homes, churches, and schools that immediately surround the Colossus Gas Plant, and hundreds of thousands more live in the greater Memphis area. A much larger share of this population is Black than that of the country’s population as a whole. (NAACP complaint)

Where is the EPA?<br>While one could think that if xAI has violates the Clean Air Act, the EPA, after all the agency responsible for enforcing environmental law, would become active. It did not.<br>So the NAACP, as is its right, took maters in their own hand.<br>The right to do so stems from the fact that Congress has made special provisions (“citizen-suit provisions”) for civil actors to take action themselves against the industry if the state or agency do not. The reason Congress (wisely) did so should be obvious: The provision exists as a safeguard against any collusion of the government with the industry against the interest of the civil society. In other words, Congress did not trust the administration to enforce the law alone.<br>When amending the Clean Air Act in 1970, Congress indeed took the inspiration for those citizen-suit provisions from similar legislation in the civil rights arena, the possibility for citizens to bring lawsuit against violators or government agencies to enforce environmental laws. Similar provisions therefore were added elsewhere, such as to the Clean Water Act.<br>It is this provision that the Trump administration, together with SpaceX, now...