China as an absolute advantage economy - Yasheng Huang
Yasheng Huang
SubscribeSign in
China as an absolute advantage economy<br>The puzzle is not why China exports cars but why it is still exporting t-shirts
Yasheng Huang<br>Jun 21, 2026
41
12<br>13
Share
In college, students are taught in an introductory economics class a famous theory about international trade, and the first thing to notice about it is that it contains no competition at all. The theory is David Ricardo’s comparative advantage, and his classic illustration uses two countries, England and Portugal, each making two goods, cloth and wine. Portugal, as it happens, can make both more cheaply than England. Ricardo’s incredible insight was that this does not determine economic welfare. What matters is relative cost. Portugal is better at wine than at cloth, so it should make wine; England is comparatively better at cloth, so it should make cloth; and the two countries trade with each other.<br>Notice what does not happen in this story. England and Portugal do not compete. They do not both fight over the wine market or both fight over the cloth market. Each specializes in one thing, gives up the other, and both end up supposedly better off. Comparative advantage is a theory about dividing up the work, not about competing for it. It also predicts that as a country grows richer and its wages rise, it will hand off the simple, labor-intensive goods such as textiles and shoes and move up into more advanced ones such as machinery and semiconductors.
To make sense of China, it helps to put Ricardo down and pick up Michael Porter. Where Ricardo’s theory has no competition in it, Porter’s theory of competitive advantage is about nothing else. It asks how the firms of a country come to beat their rivals and keep on beating them, through their suppliers, their skills, their infrastructure, and above all their scale. China is all about competition, in exactly Porter’s sense. It does not pick a few things to specialize in and trade the rest away. It competes, head to head, across the entire range of products, with everyone.
This is what I mean when I call China an absolute-advantage economy. The simplest way to define China’s absolute advantage is this: it competes with America and with Africa at the same time. At the top of the market it goes up against the United States, in artificial intelligence, electric vehicles, and electronics. At the bottom it goes up against the poorest countries in Africa, in textiles, clothing, and cheap household goods. Almost no economy in history that I know of has managed both at once, because the two ends of the market usually demand opposite things. Competing at the high end requires cheap and plentiful capital; competing at the low end requires cheap labor.<br>Understanding how China has arranged to have both unlocks the deepest mystery of that country. It somehow holds a capital-cost advantage and a labor-cost advantage at the same time. You can see the pattern plainly in the trade data. (I am working with a colleague on an academic paper on this topic.) A simple way to tell what a country is good at is to compare, industry by industry, how much it exports with how much it imports of the same product: China’s shoe exports against its shoe imports, its apparel exports against its apparel imports, its aircraft exports against its aircraft imports. Ricardo’s theory predicts that as a country grows richer this ratio should rise for advanced products and fall for simple ones, as the country climbs out of the bottom.<br>That is what happened in South Korea and Taiwan, but not in China. (By the way, the idea that China has pursued an East Asian model is plainly wrong. I will take up this issue in a book project I am starting to formulate.) Across ninety-eight industries, spanning every level of skill and labor intensity, the ratio rose almost everywhere between the mid-2000s and 2023, a stretch in which China’s income per person rose about sixfold. Between 2012 and 2023, aircraft became roughly seven times more competitive and motor vehicles three and a half times, just as one would expect of a richer country. But over the very same years knitted fabric also became about seven times more competitive, carpets nearly three times, and furniture and umbrellas rose as well. China pulled ahead of the world in jet engines and in umbrellas at once.<br>See the following graphs: China’s competitiveness rose across all factor intensities from 2012 to 2023:
Textiles are worth dwelling on, because they are the classic starter industry that every successful developing country becomes good at and then outgrows—a badge of its very success. China has refused to go along with this pattern. It is still fully competitive in textiles even as it has become a leader in advanced goods. Using trade data from Harvard’s Growth Lab, you can watch South Korea and Taiwan do what the textbook says. Between 1995 and 2015, their shares of world textile exports fell...