W Social, Fictional Metrics and the Beauty of Open Data

Login

Subscribe

The new social network W Social - which purports to be a healthier alternative to Elon Musk’s X, “made in Europe, for the world” - would be a fascinating case study for future business school seminars. Its debut has been messy, filled with controversies - and yet, it has been embraced by high profile personalities from the worlds of politics and journalism. I am about to cover its biggest scandal yet, which puts into question W Social’s core promise: “Trust your feed”.<br>A quick recap<br>W Social was announced out of nowhere at Davos this past January. The media frenzy around its soft launch was awe-inducing: European decentralized networks like Mastodon or Eurosky never received a fraction of the attention W Social commanded - even if at the time W Social didn’t have a single user and kept details about its technical infrastructure secret. People quickly found evidence that W Social was a hard fork of the open network Bluesky, based on the AT protocol. Weeks before its beta launch it quietly went closed-source - at the same time as it was embraced by the crème de la crème of European institutions, politicians and NGOs for fostering “European digital sovereignty”.<br>I have published a series of exposés about W Social - including the scoop last week that the network had quietly gone closed-source. My research has been widely quoted in German, Swiss, French and Dutch media. The tide is beginning to turn, with more critical eyes observing W Social’s operations. If you want to catch up on all my articles about W Social so far, you can find them here:<br>W Social - Elena Rossini<br>A series of articles about the controversial social network W Social, a for profit company set up by Swedish entrepreneurs, who openly admitted they want to help train European AI models with their users’ data (amongst other things).<br>Elena RossiniElena Rossini

Having become an unwitting W Social expert, I can reveal there are several scoops that I have yet to publish concerning falsehoods and critical security issues; I am receiving tips on a daily basis. Today, I’ll cover W Social’s misrepresentations about their network’s metrics.<br>Doctored Numbers on W Social's Homepage<br>A source tipped me off about the discrepancy between the metrics displayed on W Social’s landing page - which shows posts from its network as floating cards - and the real numbers of interactions when one checks the original messages on ATproto.<br>My source said:<br>The number for the comments seemed suspicious to me so I checked them against the Bluesky app. They apparently boosted the comments counts to make it appear like there is A LOT of discussion on W. This is so pathetic.<br>I checked the screenshots the source shared with me and then I went to verify the landing page of W Social and compared user metrics against the same posts on bsky.app. It’s true. The number of comments on posts by the likes of W Social CEO Anna Zeiter and the president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen are completely fabricated, doctored to appear higher (I have the distinct feeling that a W Social intern is about to be blamed for this incident.)<br>A post by Anna Zeiter about her recent appearance at the Cannes Lions conference shows 22 comments on W Social’s homepage; in reality they is only one (as seen on ATproto):

left: a screenshot of W Social's landing page showing a post by Anna Zeiter with 22 comments; right: a screenshot from Bluesky showing the post only has 1 comment<br>A post about Moldova by European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen shows 184 comments on W Social’s landing page; in reality there were only 5 comments on ATproto (reference post via mu.social):

side-by-side screenshots of the same post by Ursula von der Leyen. There are 184 comments showing on W Social's homepage, whereas in reality the real number of comments is 5<br>These are only two recent examples, but most posts showcased on W Social’s landing page have completely fabricated metrics .<br>W Social’s misrepresentations are concerning and at odds with the fact that W has become a central network of communication for the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Central Bank. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen took time out from her G7 meetings to advertise the launch of W Social last week - causing a bit of an uproar.

screenshots of social media posts by the European Commission and the European Parliament announcing the migration of their Bluesky accounts to W Social<br>Trust Your Feed? Trusted European Platforms?<br>The irony is that W Social’s tagline displayed in a huge headline on its landing page is “Trust your feed”.<br>a screenshot of W Social's homepage with the big title: "Trust Your Feed" and floating posts under itCopy on its homepage states:<br>We believe in the need for a global, trusted social media platform owned, run, and hosted in Europe. W is built on verified human users, transparency, privacy,...