Corgi, the buzzy Y Combinator-backed insurance tech startup, says it didn't steal an open source product | TechCrunch
–:–:–:–
The first StrictlyVC of 2026 hits SF on April 30. Tickets are going fast. Register now.
Founder Summit ticket savings of up to $190 end June 26. Join 1,000+ founders and VCs for all-day bootcamp. REGISTER NOW.
Close
SearchSubmit
Site Search Toggle
Mega Menu Toggle
Topics
Latest
AI
Amazon
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
Gadgets
Gaming
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
Security
Social
Space
Startups
TikTok
Transportation
Venture
More from TechCrunch
Staff
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Newsletters
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
Image Credits: YouTube/20VC with Harry Stebbings (opens in a new window)
Startups
Corgi, the buzzy Y Combinator-backed insurance tech startup, says it didn’t steal an open source product
Julie Bort
3:00 PM PDT · June 26, 2026
Y Combinator-backed insurance tech startup Corgi became embroiled in yet another controversy earlier this week when Papermark, maker of open source data room software, accused Corgi of stealing its software and passing it off as its own.
Corgi denies this. "No code was used from Papermark," the company tells TechCrunch.
But there were reasons why people believed the initial allegation, which was made by Papermark co-founder Marc Seitzon X and concerned Corgi’s newly released product called Dataroom. Deal room software is essentially secure document sharing. It is famously used by startups to pitch VCs and send them supporting materials for due diligence.
Seitz’s post blew up because he shared screenshots showing Corgi’s product using the same language for the same features as Papermark’s, word for word. He went as far as to call Corgi’s new product copyright- and license-infringing, and "fraud."
Image Credits: Marc Seitz/Papermark
Corgi’s co-founder and CEO Nico Laqua saw the tweet and promised to investigate. Soon after, he responded on X with a full denial, showing that the code was different between the two products.
While he strenuously pushed back on the allegations of a license violation — arguing that "copying my style" is a different claim than "stealing enterprise code" — he did admit that relying on a vibe-coding design led to the replica features.
"Looking back, we should’ve leaned more into our own language and visual choices instead of taking cues from existing products in the space, and that’s on us," he posted.
A Corgi spokesperson confirmed to TechCrunch that the offending features were vibe-coded and said they have already been changed, downplaying the situation.
"The issues were isolated to visual elements on two peripheral settings pages," the spokesperson told us, adding that these elements were "immediately updated" and that "our team confirmed that no code was used from Papermark."
Laqua and the spokesperson also accused Papermark of making these accusations because Corgi is offering a less expensive product. "I get that this stings since we’re putting out something mostly free that competes with his SaaS. I’d be mad too," Laqua wrote of Seitz. Seitz did not respond to a request for comment.
The copying of visual elements and identical feature language, however, went beyond sour grapes as a credible complaint. It raises a new and thornier question: If vibe coding makes it so easy to copy the look, feel, and every function of another’s work, while not copying every line of the code itself, how much does it matter if the source isn’t identical?
Obviously, legally speaking, it’s the only thing that matters. So this is not the same as the controversy over Y Combinator alum PearAI, a 2024 startup that admitted to cloning another open source project and releasing it under its own license.
Morally speaking, this is ambiguous and will become increasingly common.
As fellow YC alum and founder of the agent operating system OpenProse Dan Barrett explained on X: "In a world where a bot can trivially copy 1:1 the structure of something even if the character-level code diverges … what makes one unacceptable and the other not? existing IP law, incidental to the old world? is there not some greater principle at work here?"
Corgi is now vigorously trying to clean up any reputational damage. It has issued a cease-and-desist letter to Seitz demanding that he take down the tweet, the company confirmed to TechCrunch. The founder of Hello World Cafe, which competes in part with Corgi’s coffee shop business, says he also received a cease-and-desist from Corgi’s lawyers over a tweet joking about the Dataroom controversy. Though X still remembers. There have been hundreds of comments and countless subtweets.
This is not the first time Corgi has been accused of heavy-handed legal...