Ford hired AI and sacked humans. It backfired badly | The Independent Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent<br>Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.<br>Not nowYes please
Swipe for next article
Ford hired AI and sacked humans. It backfired badly<br>‘We didn’t pay as much attention as we should have to the experience of our most knowledgeable engineers,’ says automaker
Bookmark
Comments<br>Go to comments
Bookmark popover<br>Removed from bookmarks<br>Close popover
Workers at Ford's Dagenham Engine Plant in Essex (PA)
Your support helps us to tell the story<br>Read more
Support Now
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.<br>At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.<br>The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.<br>Your support makes all the difference.
Read more
Ford has admitted to rehiring hundreds of human workers after its aggressive AI adoption strategy backfired.<br>The US automaker hired over 350 veteran engineers, referred to internally as “gray beards”, over the past three years in order to address mistakes made by automated systems.<br>The staff will lead quality reviews after the automation issues cost the company billions of dollars, Bloomberg reported, while some workers will also help improve and train the AI systems.
“We had been relying more and more on automated quality systems and not getting the desired results,” said Kumar Galhotra, Ford’s chief operating officer.<br>“We brought back technical specialists and they hunt for failure points before a part ever reaches the plant floor.”
Ford had been increasingly relying on AI-driven inspection systems to streamline production and address quality control issues, however the firm acknowledged that AI lacked the nuanced judgement when it came to complex problems.
After rehiring experienced engineers, Ford experienced a marked improvement in its quality standards.<br>According to the latest J.D. Power Initial Quality Survey, an annual automotive benchmark that measures the quality of new vehicles, Ford ranked top among mainstream brands – the first time it has achieved that milestone in 16 years.
Ford continues to have quality issues with its older vehicles, and remains the most recalled automaker in the US, though executives blamed this on past issues involving automation, rather than the rehiring of humans.<br>The company said it would not abandon its use of AI, but plans to now use it in conjunction with human oversight and experience.
“Artificial intelligence is a fantastic tool, but it’s only as good as the information you use to train it,” said Charles Poon, Ford’s vice president of vehicle hardware engineering.
“Over prior years, we didn’t pay as much attention as we should have to the experience of our most knowledgeable engineers that have been with us through many product cycles.<br>“Mistakenly, we thought that by just introducing artificial intelligence and ingesting the design requirements that we had, that that would produce a high-quality product.”
Join our commenting forum<br>Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies<br>Comments
Most popular
Popular videos
Bulletin
Read next
Thank you for registering<br>Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in