Automation and Repression

n4r93 pts1 comments

Automation and Repression | NBER

Skip to main content

Search

Search

Automation and Repression

Daron Acemoglu,

A. Arda Gitmez

& Mehdi Shadmehr

Share

LinkedIn

Facebook

Bluesky

Threads

Email

Link

Working Paper 35336

DOI 10.3386/w35336

Issue Date June 2026

We consider a model of automation embedded in a political environment where workers can undertake a revolt (modeled as a global game), and greater inequality between capital and labor increases the likelihood of a revolt. Decentralized automation decisions raise the share of capital in national income and increase the likelihood of a successful revolt. A capitalist state (representing capital-owners) prefers to regulate the level of automation to lessen the threat of a successful revolt. The capitalist state can also redistribute to workers via the tax system or repress political action, thus creating greater room for further automation. We characterize the trade-off between the regulation of automation, redistribution and repression.

Our main result is a complementarity between automation and repression. Unless the threat of revolt is quite weak or the capital stock is very low, the capitalist state prefers repression. A higher capital stock in turn encourages more automation and thus more repression. In our full dynamic model with capital accumulation, in the long run the economy tends to repression (again unless the threat of revolt is very weak). We also prove that the same conclusions apply when firms can additionally invest in new labor-intensive tasks. Finally, we show that, starting in a democracy, capital accumulation and thus greater automation encourages the capitalists to support a coup against democracy and set up a repressive system.

Acknowledgements and Disclosures

We thank Serkan Karademir, Elif Ceren Mavi and Talat Şenocak for excellent research assistance, and Micael Castanheira and Salvatore Nunnari for useful discussions. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Hewlett Foundation, the Stone Foundation, and TÜBİTAK grant 223K672 via program 1001. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Citation and Citation Data

Copy Citation

Daron Acemoglu, A. Arda Gitmez, and Mehdi Shadmehr, "Automation and Repression," NBER Working Paper 35336 (2026), https://doi.org/10.3386/w35336.

Copy to Clipboard

Download Citation

MARC

RIS

BibTeΧ

Download Citation Data

Related

Topics

Labor Economics

Labor Supply and Demand

Development and Growth

Innovation and R&D

Other

Economic Systems

Programs

Economic Fluctuations and Growth

Labor Studies

Political Economy

More from the NBER

In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.

2025, 17th Annual Feldstein Lecture, N. Gregory Mankiw," The Fiscal Future"

Feldstein Lecture

Presenter:

N. Gregory Mankiw

N. Gregory Mankiw, Robert M. Beren Professor of Economics at Harvard University, presented the 2025 Martin Feldstein...

2025, Methods Lecture, Raj Chetty and Kosuke Imai, "Uncovering Causal Mechanisms: Mediation Analysis and Surrogate Indices"

Methods Lectures

Presenters:

Raj Chetty

& Kosuke Imai

SlidesBackground materials on mediationImai, Kosuke, Dustin Tingley, and Teppei Yamamoto. (2013). “Experimental Designs...

2025, International Trade and Macroeconomics, "Panel on The Future of the Global Economy"

Panel Discussion

Presenters:

Oleg Itskhoki,

Paul R. Krugman

& Linda Tesar

Supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation grant #G-2023-19633, the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation grant #20251294...

Follow

© 2026 National Bureau of Economic Research. All Rights Reserved.

automation repression capital nber revolt labor

Related Articles