India’s Unconvincing Economic Facade | American Enterprise Institute - AEI
Search for:
Search for:
India’s Unconvincing Economic Facade
India’s Unconvincing Economic Facade
Derek Scissors
by Derek Scissors
Senior Fellow
June 24, 2026
Report | American Enterprise Institute
Foreign and Defense Policy
-->
Latest Work
06.29.2026 | We’re Letting China Steal Our Future
06.15.2026 | What If Xi Was an Economic Reformer?
05.27.2026 | Recession with Chinese Characteristics
05.14.2026 | Discussing what the Trump-Xi summit says about Trump’s priorities: Scissors on CNBC’s ‘The Exchange’
05.10.2026 | Discussing US-China relations: Scissors on NewsNation’s ‘The Hill Sunday with Chris Stirewalt’
04.28.2026 | The Poison(ing) of Purchasing Power Parity
-->
Key Points
India portrays itself as a, or even the, global growth leader. The rest of the world should recognize that the reliability of India’s economic data is low.
This is clear in external statistics—trade competitiveness is weak despite what is supposed to be an indispensable labor force. Foreign investors limit exposure upon discovering India’s shortfalls.
The most important failing is internal. India’s workers will not be young forever, and the government hides the extent of unemployment.
Policy remains unhelpful. A distorted labor market effectively paralyzes land reform, and government borrowing to limit economic pain would make no sense if India were truly succeeding.
Introduction
Indian policymakers and analysts frequently blame the external environment for economic problems, the dramatic US-Iran war being only the most recent example. In fact, the Indian economy has not performed exceptionally well when external conditions have been benign. Decently, yes, but not exceptionally. A lack of statistical credibility undermines claims that India has for many years been the fastest-growing (major) economy.1 Complementary claims that sound fundamentals will lead to sustained future success are deeply flawed.
Indian government borrowing is substantial and poorly justified. Trade competitiveness shows little improvement, and foreign investor interest is mirrored by rejection of durable exposure. The government deliberately obscures contributions from the most important fundamental—a huge cohort of young workers—possibly because its policies ensure much of the labor force is sidelined. This is especially worrisome because now is the time for demographics to push India rapidly forward. It’s not happening.n
The Quality of National Accounts
India’s most recent official numbers look quite good on the surface. The government estimates real GDP growth for fiscal year 2026 at 7.7 percent. It was 7.1 percent the year before, an acceleration supposedly occurring despite effects from the Iran war showing up in March. However, nominal GDP grew 8.9 percent, the slowest growth since a contraction caused by the COVID outbreak.2 The credibility of “real” GDP depends first on its implicit deflator, whose accuracy is a long-standing issue.
In the Ministry of Statistics June 2026 press release, the GDP deflator was somehow smaller than the implicit deflators for the major components of GDP.3 In this way or others, and for years, the GDP deflator has been smaller than other price measurements much of the time,4 meaning real GDP growth may have been repeatedly exaggerated.
Right now, the overarching question is how an economy that has always struggled to equilibrate supply and demand can supposedly grow rapidly for a number of quarters without triggering an inflationary response. This has been described as a “Goldilocks” phase,5 but why the Goldilocks phase might have suddenly emerged is unclear. In contrast, the political incentive to manipulate GDP data is always clear.
There are accounting issues with the aptly named “discrepancies.” Perhaps unsurprisingly, the statistical presentation of discrepancies does not seem to make sense, with the on-year change figures being the same as the share of GDP. More to the point, the contribution of discrepancies to GDP growth has at times been unreasonably large, suggesting that the latter is exaggerated, just as with the deflator.6
The mediocre quality of GDP accounting can grab headlines but is not the most serious problem. A range of indicators do not correspond to a vibrant economy. Power supplied by state providers, which are dominant in the industry, rose only 1 percent in fiscal year 2026. Some blamed this on good weather. But the result for calendar year 2024 was also the slowest since the pandemic and notably slower than nominal GDP growth—a strange outcome for a developing economy that should become more power hungry.7
The financial side also raises questions. The vast majority of the population has little to invest, as reflected by more than 800 million people still receiving free food in calendar 2025. Those who can invest voted no confidence in domestic assets in fiscal 2026, with gold imports jumping...