Nerdle Review — DLES.gg<br>← Back to ReviewsSome games, like Grand Theft Auto are born in a studio. Some games, like football are born on the street. Well, Nerdle was born in a London traffic jam. In January 2022, data scientist Richard Mann was stuck in the car with his daughter Imogen, the two of them were talking about the Wordle hype, and by the time the traffic cleared they'd sketched out a maths version and agreed on a name.[1] Richard's son Alex worked out which equations were fair game, developer Marcus Tettmar built the thing in a matter of days,[2] and within a week more than a million people were nerdling.[3] The fan list these days runs from Bill Gates to Louis Theroux to Stormzy.[4]. Think about it on your next commute.<br>TLDR: It's genuinely not much more than a Wordle clone with numbers, but that's what makes it perfect, on top of that, there's something quietly lovely about a game built by a dad and his kids to make maths feel friendlier.<br>I played the original 8-digit puzzle version and solved it in 3. Here's how it scores against the DLE Review Framework. The article contains screenshots with spoilers of the game number #1622 (June 29, 2026).

The one-screen rules, visual-first with three colour examples (desktop left) (mobile right)Concept 9/10<br>The play is instant and memorable: it's Wordle, but you're guessing a maths equation instead of a five-letter word. The mechanic is borrowed and the game has never pretended otherwise, which is totally fine. It owns the daily maths corner so completely that it grew a whole galaxy of follow-ups (mini, micro, maxi, speed, instant, cross nerdle, and a pile more)[5] and a huge audience: maths lovers, teachers, and kids who'd rather test their arithmetic ability, than their vocabulary.

The classic nerdle welcome card, with a worked example grid (desktop)Time to first guess 4/10<br>Here's the one that stings. The game itself is fast to start: there's no forced account, the tutorial is optional, and the board even hands you a suggested opening guess so you don't have to think before your first move. If that were the whole story, this would be a 10.<br>It isn't, because the first thing you meet is a privacy notice from "us & our 635 personal data miners technology partners," and you have to deal with it before you can see the board. Tap Reject All (or Accept All, or wade into Options) and then dismiss the game's own intro card, and you're playing. Two dismissals and a wall of text stand between a brand-new player and their first guess. On a phone it's worse, because that notice takes over the entire screen. A quick clicker is still playing inside 30 seconds, but I hate walls of text between me and the game.

The 635-partner privacy notice loads before the board (desktop left), and swallows the whole screen on a phone (mobile right)Gameplay 28/30<br>This is where nerdle earns its keep. I played puzzle #1622 (June 29, 2026) and solved it in 3/6, so the screenshots below spoil that day. Today's answer was an 8-character division chain, and the solve felt like proper deduction rather than luck.<br>I opened with 4*9-5=31 , a deliberately greedy first guess that tests two operators and five different digits at once.

First guess, 4*9-5=31 — 4, = and 3 come back purple (desktop left) (mobile right)That came back with 4 , = and 3 all purple (in the answer, wrong spots) and * , - , 9 , 5 , 1 all black. In one move I'd learned that the only operators left in play were + and / , which is a huge cut. I believe that was a smart opener that rewarded me with information, not just a lucky hit.<br>Guess two, 24/6+3=7 , was built to test both surviving operators and reshuffle the live digits.

Second guess, 24/6+3=7 — /, 6 and = lock in green (desktop left) (mobile right)Three greens dropped at once: / , 6 and = locked into place, + went black, and 2 , 4 , 3 , 7 glowed purple. Now I knew the shape of the whole equation. With + , - and * all eliminated, the second operator slot had to be another / , and the only arrangement of 7, 2, 4 and 3 that survived every clue was 72/6/4=3 (72 over 6 is 12, 12 over 4 is 3).

The winning guess, 72/6/4=3 — all eight tiles green (desktop left) (mobile right)Solved in three. It felt fair. The hint colours did honest work, and the win came from logic with just a pinch of luck on how cleanly guess two aligned. The only reason this is a near-perfect score and not perfect, is that the maths-only premise reveals a certain limitations when you play it a lot (like I do), you'll get the solution on your third guess almost every day. As a daily maths workout it's perfect though.<br>Juice 6/10<br>The tiles flip and reveal on submit, the keyboard recolours live so you can see your eliminated characters at a glance, and the board does a nice little victory dance. It's not the flashiest game I've reviewed, but every animation is doing a job, and nothing feels unfinished. The missing bit is the slow, character by character reveal animation after you submit the row, which makes...