Agentic Reorg Simulator — model AI agents in a real org structure — Orgonaut

Orgonaut is now in early access — model your organisation before you change it. Get started

Product Solutions Pricing Integrations Blog Resources Resources Agentic Reorg Simulator AI Org Readiness Mapper Help Docs API Reference CLI OrgSpec

Security Contact<br>Login

Get Started

Free tool — no signup

What happens to your org when the agents arrive?

This is Meridian: a realistic 35-person SaaS product and engineering organisation.<br>Embed coding agents in squads, replace tier-1 support, flatten a management layer, merge teams —<br>and watch cost, capacity, and coordination change live. Then share your scenario as a link, or export it as OrgSpec.

Built on a simplified version of the model Orgonaut uses. Every assumption is visible and editable below.

Plays<br>One-click strategy moves. Apply, inspect the delta, keep editing.

Assumptions<br>Every number in this model is inspectable and yours to change.

Scenario delta<br>Every change versus the Live baseline, the way Orgonaut compares scenarios.

Copy share link Post scenario on X Export as OrgSpec YAML Reset to baseline

The share link encodes your whole scenario — nothing is stored on our side.

How the model works Opinionated on purpose, honest about limits

This simulator is not a forecast. It is a structural argument: adding AI agents to an organisation<br>changes cost and capacity, but supervision, team size, and management span decide whether that<br>capacity is real. The rules below are simplifications — deliberately visible ones, so you can<br>challenge them rather than trust a black box.

When you want the same discipline against your real organisation — real people, real salaries,<br>real teams, with history, approvals, and audit — that is what Orgonaut does.

Agents are not free capacity<br>Each senior or lead can effectively supervise a limited number of agents. Agents beyond supervision capacity contribute at 40% effectiveness. Add agents without seniors and the model tells you.

Big teams pay a coordination tax<br>Every member beyond five discounts team capacity by a configurable percentage. Merging squads is cheaper on paper — the model shows what it costs in throughput.

Every assumption is a slider<br>Agent cost, agent throughput, supervision ratios, and the coordination tax are all editable. Disagree with a number? Change it and watch the whole scenario recompute.

Deltas, not vibes<br>Every edit is compared against the Live baseline: cost, capacity, headcount, and cost per delivery point. The change log reads like a reorg proposal because that is what it is.

Take it further From a shared toy to a decision you can defend<br>The simulator makes the argument tangible. The real version of this conversation happens against your own organisation.

For CTOs and VPs of Engineering<br>Share a scenario link with your leadership team instead of a hand-drawn diagram. Then model the real thing: import your org, clone it into a scenario, and compare deltas with real numbers.

For AI consultants<br>Run this live in workshops. Adjust the assumptions with the client in the room, agree on the numbers, and use the exported OrgSpec document as the starting point for a real engagement.

For the sceptics<br>Crank the agent count with no seniors, or merge everything into one mega-team. The model pushes back — because structure still matters in the agentic age. That is the whole point.

Model your real organisation Run this with clients

Design your organisation for the agentic age<br>Import your real org, model scenarios with people and agents together, and compare deltas before you commit anything.<br>Get started free Talk to Orgonaut