The FCC, half a century on – CERN Courier

Topics

Nuclear Physics

View more<br>-->

IOP Publishing

Jobs

Sign in

Register

Enter e-mail address

Show<br>Enter password

Remember me

Forgot your password?

Enter e-mail address

This e-mail address will be used to create your account

Reset your password

Please enter the e-mail address you used to register to reset your password

Enter e-mail address

Registration complete

Thank you for registering

If you'd like to change your details at any time, please visit My account

Close

Accelerators

Opinion

The FCC, half a century on

2 June 2026

The European Strategy has recommended the FCC-ee as CERN’s next flagship collider. The case for it, Alain Blondel argues, rests on 50 years of inventions and discoveries.

Alain Blondel is emeritus director of research at LPNHE-CNRS, Paris, and an honorary professor at the University of Geneva. Credit: A Blondel ">

Alain Blondel is emeritus director of research at LPNHE-CNRS, Paris, and an honorary professor at the University of Geneva. Credit: A Blondel

The community has spoken: the electron–positron Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee) is the preferred next flagship project for CERN. As an initiator of the concept of a circular Higgs factory in 2011, I was elated by this outcome. But it also made me wonder: why did it take so long? To answer this, we need to travel back 50 years.

1976 was an eventful year for particle physics. The open charm was discovered at SPEAR, while the J/ψ earned Burton Richter and Samuel Ting their Nobel Prize. The same year, Richter authored both the first yellow report on a large e+e– (LEP) colliding ring and the first paper proposing a linear e+e– collider. Gargamelle’s measurement of the ratio of Z-induced over W-induced neutrino interactions had allowed the Standard Model (SM) – by then a familiar name – to predict the masses of the W and Z bosons. And Carlo Rubbia, synergy wizard, proposed to undercut the e+e– aficionados by converting the SPS into a proton–antiproton collider. The W and Z bosons were duly discovered in 1983.

In 1987, following the La Thuile Workshop on Physics at Future Accelerators and before LEP had even been completed, Rubbia called a general meeting in CERN’s main auditorium to discuss the future beyond LEP. Two contenders stood out: a 5 TeV e+e– linear collider in a new 30 km tunnel (CLIC), or a 20 TeV pp collider (LHC) with the advantage of fitting in the already financed and nearly finished LEP tunnel. The relative physics merits of the two machines were compared on supersymmetry and Higgs compositeness. The LHC was chosen, and CLIC became a priority R&D programme.

We had a whale of a time at LEP, establishing that light neutrinos are exactly three, measuring the Z mass to six digits and predicting the top-quark mass through radiative corrections a few months before its Tevatron discovery.

By 1996, the LHC was approved and a small group at CERN was considering what could follow it. The listed options were a high-energy future LHC (FLHC), CLIC, and a 4 TeV muon collider. A first 0.5–1 TeV linear collider (LC) was assumed to be done elsewhere. In that context, a circular e+e– machine was mentioned only as a top factory add-on to the FLHC programme, with a design extrapolated from LEP and a performance well below the LC. The prevailing assumption was that the LHC would detect the Higgs boson and supersymmetry, if either existed.

A breakthrough came in 1999, when the asymmetric B factories PEP-II and KEKB, with separated e+ and e– rings and continuous top-up injection, demonstrated luminosities orders of magnitude higher than LEP. Meanwhile, LEP Higgs-hunted fiercely until the end of 2000, setting a lower mass limit at 114.5 GeV, while precision measurements set an upper mass limit of about 180 GeV.

The hunt is on

Come the summer of 2011, the LHC experiments were taking data at 7 TeV. The hunt for the Higgs and the supersymmetric particles was on, and the first limits already constrained the Higgs mass below that of a W pair. That clarified the required centre-of-mass energy of a Higgs factory: a relatively low-energy e+e– collider would do. Locating it in the LEP/LHC tunnel was an obvious possibility, and had already been discussed in the corridors of the EPS-HEP conference in Grenoble that July. Five months later, applying the B-factory design principles, a Higgs factory fitting in the LHC tunnel was evaluated. “LEP3” offered luminosity significantly higher than the linear collider, and the advantage of running several experiments simultaneously. On the downside, its maximum energy fell short of the top-pair-production threshold… and the LHC tunnel was already occupied.

None of this was a straight line. It took 15 years for the physics to make the case on its own terms

Presented with this evaluation, some members of the CERN Scientific Policy Committee suggested that an e+e– Higgs factory more than triple the size of LEP would make a great initial step...