[2606.22737] GroundEval: A Deterministic Replacement for LLM-as-Judge in Stateful Agent Evaluation

Skip to main content

arXiv is now an independent nonprofit!<br>Learn more<br>&times;

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search &middot; Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2606.22737 (cs)

[Submitted on 22 Jun 2026 (v1), last revised 2 Jul 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:GroundEval: A Deterministic Replacement for LLM-as-Judge in Stateful Agent Evaluation

Authors:Jeffrey Flynt<br>View a PDF of the paper titled GroundEval: A Deterministic Replacement for LLM-as-Judge in Stateful Agent Evaluation, by Jeffrey Flynt

View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Before letting an agent operate over real context, can you prove it used the right evidence? GroundEval turns that question into a deterministic test of what the agent searched, fetched, cited, and was permitted to access. In one case study, two frontier LLM judges scored a plausible agent response 0.85 and higher. But the trace told a different story: the agent had never retrieved the artifact its answer depended on, yielding a GroundEval score of 0.000.

We introduce GroundEval, a judge-free framework for evaluating agents against grounded, time-bounded, and access-controlled evidence. GroundEval uses a domain configuration to generate questions, lets the agent choose how to answer, and then scores both the final answer and the recorded trajectory that produced it. The benchmark targets three failures that LLM-as-judge evaluation struggles to detect: whether an agent checked before claiming absence, reasoned only from evidence available to the actor at the relevant time, and used the correct causal mechanism rather than a plausible one. These correspond to three tracks: Silence, Perspective, and Counterfactual. GroundEval exposes when plausible answers rest on invalid evidence paths, and produces structured per-question diagnostics that pair tool activity with the agent's turn-level narration, making each score inspectable rather than merely reported. Our case studies suggest this failure mode is common rather than exceptional, one that final-answer and judge-based evaluation cannot detect by construction.

Comments:<br>Streamlined entry point into framework

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2606.22737 [cs.AI]

(or<br>arXiv:2606.22737v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.22737

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history<br>From: Jeffrey Flynt [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:41:16 UTC (22 KB)

[v2]<br>Thu, 2 Jul 2026 03:26:27 UTC (21 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled GroundEval: A Deterministic Replacement for LLM-as-Judge in Stateful Agent Evaluation, by Jeffrey Flynt<br>View PDF<br>HTML (experimental)<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs<br>cs.CL<br>cs.SE

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |<br>Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Major funding support from