Incompetent Content Moderation and Sexy Stuff | by Illuminati Ganga Agent 86 | luminasticity | Jul, 2026 | MediumSitemapOpen in appSign up<br>Sign in

Medium Logo

Get app<br>Write

Search

Sign up<br>Sign in

luminasticity

A plunders from B the goods of C, and for compensation B picks the pocket of D.

Incompetent Content Moderation and Sexy Stuff

Illuminati Ganga Agent 86

6 min read·<br>2 hours ago

Listen

Share

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Every now and then Illuminati Ganga on various social media platforms gets a strike against it for being mean or antisocial or in the case of Bluesky, for some unknown reason, raunchy and perverse. Since I’m chief editor I often have to look at these things to determine if there is anything there to be worried about.<br>Recently the post below was hidden due to matters of sexual suggestiveness.

Now this I can sort of understand, I don’t think Led Zeppelin was thinking sexy thoughts about this, at the time that photo was taken, the era of Roger Dean Classic Rock illustration. But on the other hand if released today it would have a different meaning, because meanings are formed by their times. And the world has somewhat coarsened on these matters.<br>And obviously the Agent who posted the parodied cover made that very same coarse connection, and of course applied it to Donald Trump, the most logical person to apply these kinds of things to in the current world. In fact as the thread was evidently Classic Album cover parodies with the stupid Arch of Freedom or whatever it is called, it really seems like the combination of Trump and Classic Rock caused the seeking out of this particular cover, slapping the arch on it and calling it House of Pedos.<br>Nonetheless, despite how the image looks today, it is an image almost everyone has seen and understands, hopefully, that it was not intended as an idyllic postcard from Epstein Island.<br>The original meaning was evidently in reference to the end of the book Childhood’s End, a Science Fiction novel about the dawning of a new age of humanity.

I did also consider maybe they just thought Led Zeppelin sexually suggestive, I mean did you ever listen to the Lemon Song, man!?!

But the post above never got any problems so I know it can’t be the Zep.<br>Of course Bluesky doesn’t always make stupid ludicrous decisions, here is a post that was busted when a stupid gnome couldn’t stop ogling a nymph’s tits like a total perv

And then here, her naughty sister was shacked up with a fox in the haunted wood

Maybe Bluesky just dislikes that whole family, you know? I mean they are quite a lot of lascivious little tarts, so I see why the worry that they will corrupt the morals of the mundane world that Bluesky lords over.<br>I mean the whole, women whose breasts are represented by a curve of ink and a dot are super hot, but I think too much of a fringe interest to really be penalized.

Actually going through the back log I found the post above — here’s the image being hidden. PHWOAARRRHHHH.<br>Press enter or click to view image in full size

Yeah, that was a sexually suggestive label at first but now<br>Press enter or click to view image in full size

It’s artistic nudes people! So I complained, they reviewed, and I didn’t look back and now, it is “artistic nudes” . What exactly is the problem with the artistic nude? I can understand when you say something is sexually suggestive because what if people sitting at a cafe checking their bluesky feed are forced to masturbate in public by the sinful things they get exposed to? I get it, its bad for business.<br>So sexually suggestive stuff has to be policed, but what of the artistic nudes? It seems that the artistic nudes label is actually for stuff that they think is sexually suggestive but can’t admit that they find sexually suggestive because they know the next question will be “What the hell is wrong with you, you freak!?”<br>Anyway it sure was a smart move this picture, you can see how the artist managed to appeal to the clientele who wanted to masturbate while looking at the breasts of young women but not other parts of the icky human body, and the clientele who wanted to masturbate while looking at the bottoms of grey geese but not their annoying beaked heads. Those are two really big markets right there.<br>Here’s another great example — this one was censored for a couple hours!

Nipples!! Painted Nipples from more than a century ago!! Genitals covered by Vines. They are evil!<br>But despite all these well meaning absolutely clueless missteps, there are things just as meritless that Bluesky ignores, and I’m wondering why?!<br>Look — The Buttocks of a Man!! What do we think this is?! Netflix???!!!

Phone sex with Tuba, what the hell!?! And yet, no moderation!!

Yeah, Nothing Suggestive here Bluesky, brilliant!

Personally there is nothing hotter than cosplay sex where some smooth talking and not especially attractive fool (I relate so much to this guy!!) convinces a reticent Pierrot into making the beast with 2...