Mark Zuckerberg’s biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4 trillion | The Independent Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent<br>Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.<br>Not nowYes please
Swipe for next article
Mark Zuckerberg’s biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4 trillion<br>Meta Platforms said in a court filing on Monday that four states were seeking $1.4 trillion in penalties over accusations that the company designed its Facebook and Instagram platforms to addict young users
Bookmark
Comments<br>Go to comments
Bookmark popover<br>Removed from bookmarks<br>Close popover
Mark Zuckerberg struggles to answer phone call during 'super intelligence' Meta demonstration
Sign up to our free weekly IndyTech newsletter delivered straight to your inbox<br>Sign up to our free IndyTech newsletter<br>Sign up to our free IndyTech newsletter
Email*
SIGN UP<br>I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice
Meta Platforms could face an unprecedented $1.4 trillion in penalties after four states accused the tech giant of deliberately designing Facebook and Instagram to addict young users while misleading the public about the platforms' safety.<br>The eye-watering figure was disclosed by Meta itself in a recent court filing responding to attorneys general's proposed penalty calculations. The total is close to the company's roughly $1.5 trillion market value.<br>The disclosure comes ahead of a pivotal trial beginning in August in Oakland, California. California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey allege Meta violated state consumer protection laws by creating addictive products for children and teens.<br>open image in gallery
Meta denies the allegations, calling the proposed penalty "unsupported by the evidence” (Reuters)<br>Meta denies the allegations, calling the proposed penalty "unsupported by the evidence."
"A sanction of that size has no analog in the history of consumer protection enforcement," the company said in its court filing.
Although the states' filings remain under seal, hearings in June revealed they calculated the potential penalties by multiplying the number of alleged violations by fines allowed under state law. The alleged violations are based on the estimated number of children and teenagers affected.<br>open image in gallery
The August trial before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will also consider claims brought by 29 states accusing Meta of violating the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (Reuters)<br>The August trial before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will also consider claims brought by 29 states accusing Meta of violating the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act by collecting children's data without proper parental consent.
Meta has argued that "social media addiction" is not an established psychiatric diagnosis and therefore its statements denying its platforms are addictive could not have been false.<br>The company faces additional legal battles beyond the August trial. Fourteen more states are pursuing similar claims under their own laws, with a separate trial scheduled for February.<br>open image in gallery
California Attorney General Rob Bonta accused Meta of putting profits ahead of children's safety and pledged to hold the company "fully accountable" for its alleged role in the youth mental health crisis (Getty)<br>Last month, Judge Rogers rejected Meta's request to delay the August proceedings, ruling there are unresolved factual disputes over whether its platforms are addictive, whether the company falsely denied designing them that way, and whether Meta intentionally targeted children.
Following that ruling, California Attorney General Rob Bonta accused Meta of putting profits ahead of children's safety and pledged to hold the company "fully accountable" for its alleged role in the youth mental health crisis.
Meta is one of several social media companies facing mounting legal pressure. Snap, Alphabet-owned YouTube and ByteDance-owned TikTok are also battling thousands of lawsuits alleging they intentionally designed their platforms to keep children and teenagers hooked, contributing to widespread mental health problems.
New Mexico became the first state to take such claims to trial, winning a $375 million jury verdict in March after jurors found the company had misled consumers. A judge is now considering whether to award additional damages and order changes to Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp.
Join our commenting forum<br>Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies<br>Comments
Most popular
Popular videos
Bulletin
Read next
Thank you for registering<br>Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in