Is Life Just Different? | Quanta Magazine
About Quanta
Search
Search for:
Search<br>Search
Newsletter
Get the latest news delivered to your inbox.
Subscribe
Recent newsletters
Follow Quanta
Youtube
RSS
An editorially independent publication supported by the Simons Foundation.
Type search term(s) and press enter
What are you looking for?
Search
Home
Is Life Just Different?
Comment
Save Article
Read Later
Share
Copied!
Copy link
Ycombinator
Comment
Comments
Save Article<br>Read Later
Read Later
Qualia
Is Life Just Different?
By
Philip Ball
July 8, 2026
The idea of ‘biological agency’ — that life devises its own goals and behaves accordingly — complicates our understanding of what it means to be alive. But does it serve a scientific purpose?
Comment
Save Article
Read Later
Eduardo Ramón for Quanta Magazine
Introduction
By Philip Ball
Contributing Writer
July 8, 2026
View PDF/Print Mode
behavior
biology
consciousness
emergence
evolution
features
origins of life
Qualia
All topics
In 1993, a team led by the planetary scientist Carl Sagan tentatively concluded that there is life on Earth. Not much of a deduction, you might think — except that the researchers confined their evidence to observations made by the Galileo spacecraft, which had flown past our planet three years earlier on a looping journey to Jupiter. So great is the transformative power of life that its presence can be detected just from the light and radio waves our planet emits or reflects into space. Today we scan the cosmos for some of these telltale signatures light-years away.
Life leaves a mark, yet even now there’s no scientific consensus about what makes living things so different from inorganic substances like the rocks, gases, and oceans that are the sole components of dead worlds. Many scientists cite properties such as replication or metabolism. Others speak in more abstract terms about the way life is out of thermodynamic equilibrium with its surroundings. But some give another kind of answer. Living organisms are different because they do stuff for reasons.
p]:my-6 [&>ul]:my-6 [&>ol]:my-6 [&>p]:text-3-5 [&>p]:leading-6.5 [&>li]:text-3-5 [&>li]:leading-6.5 [&_img.alignleft]:float-left [&_img.alignleft]:mr-5 [&_img.alignleft]:ml-0 [&_img.alignleft]:my-5 [&_img.alignright]:float-right [&_img.alignright]:ml-5 [&_img.alignright]:mr-0 [&_img.alignright]:my-5 [&_figure]:m-0 [&_figcaption]:relative [&_figcaption]:flex [&_figcaption]:flex-col [&_figcaption]:gap-2 [&_figcaption]:pt-2 [&_figcaption]:pb-4-5 [&_figcaption]:mt-0 [&_figcaption]:mb-6 &_figcaption]:font-pangram [&_figcaption]:after:content-[""] [&_figcaption]:after:absolute [&_figcaption]:after:bottom-0 [&_figcaption]:after:w-11 [&_figcaption]:after:h-0.5 [&_figcaption]:after:bg-gray-1a1 [&_.caption]:block [&_.caption]:font-pangram [&_.caption]:text-0xxs [&_.caption]:leading-4-5 [&_.caption]:m-0 [&_.attribution]:block [&_.attribution]:font-pangram [&_.attribution]:text-xs [&_.attribution]:leading-4-5 [&_.attribution]:m-0 [&_.attribution]:before:content-none show-dropcap" style="color: #000000;"><br>I n philosophy, “qualia” refers to the subjective qualities of our experience: what it’s like for Alice to see blue or for Bob to feel delighted. Qualia are “the ways things seem to us,” as the late philosopher Daniel Dennett put it. In these essays, our columnists follow their curiosity, and explore important but not necessarily answerable scientific questions.
It’s not enough to say that life is a nonequilibrium organized state through which there’s a constant flux of matter and energy. That description applies to hurricanes, too. But hurricanes just are. Only living entities have goals: to find food, to reproduce, to survive, sometimes simply to experience good things. (Dog owners will recognize that this is not just a human attribute.)
One way to express this idea is to say that living organisms have “agency.” It’s a hotly contested term. Some biologists reject it outright, at least for any organisms except humans, because we decide on our actions with conscious deliberation. (Whether we’re truly the only species to do so is another issue.) Others think that agency is a fundamental attribute of all life. Since there’s no agreed-upon definition of the term, to some extent it can mean whatever you want it to mean. But the debate about biological agency touches on fundamental issues in our understanding of what it means to be alive, because agency evokes a notion that biologists and philosophers have always wrestled with: teleology, the apparent purposiveness of life. If we admit agency into biology, do we open the floodgates to ideas about design, vitalism, or cosmic meaning? Or is it just a recognition of what makes life such a special state of matter?
To me, the notion of agency indeed speaks to our intuitive sense of what makes living things so special: not mere machines pushed...