Everyone gets faster. Not everyone gets more valuable. - Justin Edwards

Skip to content

JUSTIN EDWARDS

Consultant. Rubyist.

Problem solver.

JE

Justin Edwards

// on this page

📅<br>Book time with me

Or send a message

in

𝕏<br>🦋

I'm<br>extremely inactive<br>on social media.

Calendly<br>or the contact form is faster.

You&rsquo;ve seen the story by now. Somebody with no technical background, no business writing a line of code, sits down with an AI chatbot and ships a real, working website over a weekend. A year earlier it would have been impossible. The floor came up. People who could never do the thing can suddenly do the thing.

That is the story everyone wants to tell about AI right now, and the research seems to back it up. There&rsquo;s a study of a few thousand customer support reps where the rookies got dramatically more productive while the veterans barely moved. There&rsquo;s a controlled experiment where developers built a little web server and the least experienced ones got the biggest speedup. There&rsquo;s one on professional writing where the weakest writers gained the most. Same shape every time. AI helps the bottom more than the top. The gap closes.

So the comfortable conclusion is that AI is the great equalizer. The tide comes in, every boat rises, and the little boats rise fastest.

I think that conclusion is wrong. Not the data. The data is fine. The conclusion. And it goes wrong in a specific, instructive way. It takes one slice of the picture and mistakes it for the whole thing.

Two true stories that disagree

There are two competing intuitions about what AI does to a workforce, and the funny part is that both of them are correct. They just describe different parts of the same picture.

The first is the steady multiplier. AI gives everyone some constant boost, a flat percentage on top of whatever you already produce. Under that story the strong pull ahead, because a percentage of a big number is a bigger number. The gap widens.

The second is compression. The bottom rises faster than the top, the floor comes up, and the distance between the worst and the best shrinks. That is the equalizer story, and it&rsquo;s the one the headline studies found.

Here&rsquo;s the trick. If you stand at one end of the picture and squint, you see the multiplier. If you stand at the other end and squint, you see compression. Each camp is looking at a real region and reporting honestly what they see in it. The mistake, every time, is assuming the slice you happen to be standing in is the whole graph. It isn&rsquo;t. Step back far enough to take in all of it at once and the straight lines bend into something more complicated, and a good deal less comfortable.

The compression is real, and it&rsquo;s bait

Start with the compression studies, since they&rsquo;re the ones people wave around. Look at what they actually measured. A support ticket with a known good resolution. A standalone coding kata with a clean spec. A short writing prompt. Every one of them is bounded, single skill, clearly specified, and cheap to check. You know exactly what done looks like before you start.

In a world like that, of course the novice gains the most. AI hands them a floor of competence they didn&rsquo;t have and they sprint to it. The expert was already near the ceiling, so there isn&rsquo;t much headroom left to gain. Compression isn&rsquo;t a deep truth about intelligence. It&rsquo;s arithmetic. Give everyone a floor and the people standing on the floor benefit while the people near the ceiling don&rsquo;t.

I lift. Now imagine there was a machine at the gym that lifted the weight for you. Not the kind you lift against, an actual machine that does the lifting while you stand there and watch. It would not make you strong. Showing up and moving the load yourself is the only thing that makes you strong, and nothing shortcuts that. A floor of competence is that imaginary machine. It is not the same thing as being able to carry the load yourself when the machine isn&rsquo;t there.

The trouble is that almost no real software work looks like the exercise. Real work is unbounded, underspecified, and expensive to verify. The spec is wrong. The requirements contradict each other. The client is an asshole who needs to get smacked down. The thing has to live inside a system that is already on fire in three places. Done is a judgment call. Sometimes done is a lengthy and expensive legal debate. And that is where the floor quietly stops helping you.

Speed is not value

Here&rsquo;s the move almost everyone misses. Going faster on the task is not the same as being worth more.

There&rsquo;s an old idea from manufacturing. Walk the factory floor and look for where the inventory piles up. The pile is sitting in front of your slowest machine, and that slowest machine is the only thing actually setting the pace of the whole line. Speed up any other station and you don&rsquo;t ship one more unit. You just grow the pile in front of the...