The Trade in Looted Antiquities Endures for One Reason: Demand

derbOac2 pts0 comments

The Trade in Looted Antiquities Endures for One Reason: Demand

Join Artnet PRO

About

News

Art World

Art & Exhibitions

Artists

Archaeology & History

Art & Tech

Art Collectors

Art History

Law & Politics

Opinion

Pop Culture

People

Museums & Institutions

Collectibles

Marketplace

Artnet Auctions

Gallery Network

Books

See All Art World

Market

Columns

The Art Detective

Wet Paint

The Hammer

Kenny Schachter

The Gray Market

Auctions

Galleries

Art Fairs

Special Reports

The Intelligence Report

The Innovators List

See All Market

Podcast

Artnet PRO

About

Opinion

The Trade in Looted Antiquities Endures for One Reason: Demand

Matthew Campbell, author of "The Man Who Stole the Gods," on why the illicit antiquities trade remains alive and well.

Bhima statue returned by the Norton Simon Museum to Cambodia during a handover ceremony at the Council of Ministers on June 3, 2014 in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Photo: Omar Havana / Getty Images.

Matthew Campbell

Jun 10, 2026

ShareShare This Article

One evening in 1997, a band of men began digging toward the base of a towering square chamber at Koh Ker, a 10th-century temple in northwest Cambodia. It was dangerous work. When multiple groups coveted a site like this one, they sometimes resolved their dispute by Kalashnikov. And every one of the men knew that the combatants in their country’s ongoing, 30-year civil war—the Khmer Rouge and proxy forces backed by the United States and the Soviet Union—had littered the countryside with land mines. So the crew moved gingerly as they dug, coming closer with each spadeful of earth to the treasures they were pursuing.

The best of Artnet News in your inbox.

Sign up for our daily newsletter.

The best of Artnet News in your inbox.

Sign up for our daily newsletter.

Please enter a valid email address

Signup failed. Please try again later.

You have successfully subscribed to Artnet News.

Two were divine female figures in stone; the third was a powerfully built male, likely a representation of Shiva, the Hindu god of destruction. It took hours to excavate the statues, and then days to move them to Cambodia’s border with Thailand. There, brokers were standing by to transport them to Bangkok, mainland Southeast Asia’s portal to the world.

The best of Artnet News in your inbox.

Sign up for our daily newsletter.

The best of Artnet News in your inbox.

Sign up for our daily newsletter.

Please enter a valid email address

Signup failed. Please try again later.

You have successfully subscribed to Artnet News.

The male figure would ultimately be purchased by an American billionaire. One of the females would be sold by a London dealer and then disappear into a private collection. The third took a more rarefied path: By 1998, it was in the possession of a dealer in Manhattan. Not long after that, it was acquired by the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

The Prasat Chen temple in the Koh Ker temple area in Preah Vihear province, some 360 kilometers north of Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Photo: Tang Chhin Sothy / AFP / Getty Images.

Two of these three statues are now back in Cambodia, the result of a series of sprawling investigations of a British dealer, the late Douglas Latchford. For decades, Latchford allegedly trafficked stolen Cambodian sculptures—many of them taken by men affiliated with the Khmer Rouge—to Western buyers willing to pay seven-figure prices. Thanks to extraordinary investigative work by the Cambodian government, independent activists, and American law enforcement, his network has been largely dismantled.

But their efforts exposed an uncomfortable truth: that despite widespread claims from museums, auction houses, and dealers that they now take provenance seriously, many antiquities are still being stolen and trafficked around the world, feeding an illicit market that remains robust.

Douglas Latchford (center) with Cambodian deputy Prime Minister Sok An (left) at the National Museum of Cambodia in Phnom Penh, 2009. Photo: Tang Chhin Sothy / AFP via Getty Images.

Cambodia is far from the only example. Thousands of works looted from Iraq and Syria during 21st-century conflicts remain missing. The horrific civil war in Sudan has resulted in widespread losses of artifacts, including the reported theft of 60 percent of the collection of the country’s National Museum. In Ukraine, there’s extensive evidence that Russian forces have engaged in the systematic looting of artworks, which have since disappeared to the other side of the countries’ shared border.

These crimes don’t just rob countries of their heritage and cultural assets. They can result in the destruction of priceless objects as thieves attempt to remove them with construction equipment or even explosives. They also get people killed, whether in turf battles between looting crews or attacks on guards trying to protect collections.

Bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara sculpture from the 10th to 11th-century Angkor period, repatriated to the...

artnet cambodia news antiquities trade looted

Related Articles