[2607.05861] Mitigating Factual Hallucination in Large Reasoning Models via Mixed-Mode Advantage Regularization
Skip to main content
arXiv is now an independent nonprofit!<br>Learn more<br>×
Search arXiv
Press Enter to search · Advanced search
-->
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2607.05861 (cs)
[Submitted on 7 Jul 2026]
Title:Mitigating Factual Hallucination in Large Reasoning Models via Mixed-Mode Advantage Regularization
Authors:Kaishen Wang, Tong Zheng, Xuehao Cui, Ruibo Chen, Tianyi Xiong, Heng Huang<br>View a PDF of the paper titled Mitigating Factual Hallucination in Large Reasoning Models via Mixed-Mode Advantage Regularization, by Kaishen Wang and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Large reasoning models (LRMs) improve language model capabilities by generating explicit thinking traces before final answers. In factuality-oriented question answering (QA), such thinking often improves overall performance by helping the model recover relevant knowledge and refine its answers. However, we find that this benefit is not uniform at the instance level: explicit thinking can also overturn correct non-thinking answers and lead to factual drift. We refer to this failure mode as \emph{thinking-induced hallucination}. To explain this phenomenon, we formulate explicit thinking in factuality QA as a thinking residual over the model's direct-answer tendency, which can either recover missing knowledge or introduce unsupported associations. Based on this formulation, we propose MARGO, \underline{\textit{M}}ixed-Mode \underline{\textit{A}}dvantage \underline{\textit{R}}egularization for \underline{\textit{G}}rounded \underline{\textit{O}}ptimization, a reinforcement learning framework that uses non-thinking rollouts as same-model references in advantage estimation. By constructing mixed-mode rollout groups with both thinking and non-thinking trajectories, MARGO evaluates whether explicit thinking adds factual value beyond direct answering, thereby suppressing hallucination-prone thinking while preserving beneficial thinking behaviors. Experiments across multiple factuality-oriented QA benchmarks demonstrate that MARGO improves factual reliability over strong baselines, while evaluations on mathematical benchmarks show that it preserves general reasoning ability.
Comments:<br>19 pages, 3 figures, 8 tables
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as:<br>arXiv:2607.05861 [cs.CL]
(or<br>arXiv:2607.05861v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.05861
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history<br>From: Kaishen Wang [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Tue, 7 Jul 2026 05:34:25 UTC (1,065 KB)
Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Mitigating Factual Hallucination in Large Reasoning Models via Mixed-Mode Advantage Regularization, by Kaishen Wang and 5 other authors<br>View PDF<br>TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
next >
new<br>recent<br>| 2026-07
Change to browse by:
cs<br>cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |<br>Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
Major funding support from