Does Anthropic Buy Legitimacy Through Hiring?

Artificial Rhetoric

SubscribeSign in

Does Anthropic Buy Legitimacy Through Hiring?

Artificial Rhetoric<br>Jul 13, 2026

Share

When asked about Meta’s attempts to poach his people with nine-figure offers last year, Dario Amodei said that Mark Zuckerberg was “trying to buy something that cannot be bought, and that is alignment with the mission.” It was a good line, not least because it was plausibly true. There’s probably no check large enough to make someone believe in what you are doing, even if there is a sum of money that will make most people pretend to.<br>This essay is about things you can buy with a high enough salary, or at least that people believe can be purchased that way. In particular, it’s about Anthropic and the specific way they go about making their most visible hires, their goals, and what their money buys. It’s not a condemning article, for the record; like most subjects, this one is complex. Not having an ax to grind with Anthropic means I’m much more curious about this than I am condemning,<br>Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Subscribe

Of all the more ordinary hires Anthropic makes in a year, the vast majority are mundane, if still elite among the masses potential SV teammates. They are engineers and product people and an endless stream of machine learning experts. They are not usually announced, at least not in highly visible ways.<br>Others are more distinct. They include a psychologist known for approachable scientific debunking, a public sector commentator read by members of Congress and white house staffers, and the AI safety philosopher who set out perhaps the most careful public case on AI dangers. Among them is also perhaps the most credible independent voice in the field, a man who seven months before he joined was on podcasts calling the AI industry’s hype fundraising.<br>Some people, perhaps predictably, react to these kinds of hires in a more negative way:

Holly ⏸️ Elmore@ilex_ulmus

Amanda Askell and Joe Carlsmith are trying to obscure what Anthropic is doing with their harmless philosopher image. It's despicable. Do not let them get away with it. You should be groaning so hard when they come up that Anthropic doesn't even bother.<br>3:27 AM · Feb 19, 2026 · 3.17K Views

3 Replies · 38 Likes

That’s Holly Elmore, the executive director of Pause AI. You wouldn’t expect her to be neutral or positive about anything related to AI in the same way you wouldn’t expect glowing reviews of a steak from the head of PETA. At the same time, she’s not alone in her worries. A simple search of the kind of people who tend to care about this kind of thing brings up plenty of reactions to the hires ranging from celebration to concern, and that concern has grown as Anthropic has captured-slash-recruited more and more voices.<br>None of these are legitimacy hires in the sense that a room full of executives schemed to purchase credibility. I have no idea what was said in those rooms, and for the argument that follows, it does not matter. They are legitimacy hires in a plainer and more unsettling sense: whatever else each person was brought on to do, the effect of hiring them was to transfer some portion of their hard-won public trust onto Anthropic — automatically, mechanically, whether or not anyone willed it, and in at least one case despite the person’s explicit, written effort to stop it.<br>The natural rebuttal is Dario’s, that these are mission-aligned people joining a mission they believe in. Under that framing, if it’s correct, treating their sincerity as an asset is a cynical, unfair approach not just because it miscasts both the hirers and hirees as evil, but because it dyes an effort to staff conscientious true believers as a sellout’s endeavor.<br>The point of this article isn’t to make a decision, but to draw a series of profiles about who these kinds of hires are, what they do at Anthropic, and how that affects the public-facing side of the organization. In other words, it’s looking at what Anthropic gets out of a celebrity outside of what they’d get from an unknown with identical work output.<br>What follows is four people, arranged from the case that most embarrasses the Anthropic Absorbs It’s Critics thesis to much more ambiguous cases that at least superficially look more like prestige-based hires.

As foreshadowed, let’s start with the hire that fits the worst with the idea that Anthropic is willing to spend money to gain legitimacy by ruining someone else’s. That’s Andrej Karpathy, perhaps the most qualified person for the role he’s filling on this list, and maybe among the top at Anthropic in general.<br>Andrej Karpathy is not a comms team hire, but he is still a well-known, large-audience voice. He is one of perhaps the best people living at explaining the theory of large language models and the complex engineering of actually training one at scale. He’s a founding member of OpenAI and the man most...