CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs(2024)

hamburgererror1 pts0 comments

[2406.18521] CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs

Skip to main content

arXiv is now an independent nonprofit!<br>Learn more<br>&times;

Search arXiv

Press Enter to search &middot; Advanced search

-->

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2406.18521 (cs)

[Submitted on 26 Jun 2024]

Title:CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs

Authors:Zirui Wang, Mengzhou Xia, Luxi He, Howard Chen, Yitao Liu, Richard Zhu, Kaiqu Liang, Xindi Wu, Haotian Liu, Sadhika Malladi, Alexis Chevalier, Sanjeev Arora, Danqi Chen<br>View a PDF of the paper titled CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs, by Zirui Wang and 12 other authors

View PDF

Abstract:Chart understanding plays a pivotal role when applying Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to real-world tasks such as analyzing scientific papers or financial reports. However, existing datasets often focus on oversimplified and homogeneous charts with template-based questions, leading to an over-optimistic measure of progress. We demonstrate that although open-source models can appear to outperform strong proprietary models on these benchmarks, a simple stress test with slightly different charts or questions can deteriorate performance by up to 34.5%. In this work, we propose CharXiv, a comprehensive evaluation suite involving 2,323 natural, challenging, and diverse charts from arXiv papers. CharXiv includes two types of questions: 1) descriptive questions about examining basic chart elements and 2) reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across complex visual elements in the chart. To ensure quality, all charts and questions are handpicked, curated, and verified by human experts. Our results reveal a substantial, previously underestimated gap between the reasoning skills of the strongest proprietary model (i.e., GPT-4o), which achieves 47.1% accuracy, and the strongest open-source model (i.e., InternVL Chat V1.5), which achieves 29.2%. All models lag far behind human performance of 80.5%, underscoring weaknesses in the chart understanding capabilities of existing MLLMs. We hope CharXiv facilitates future research on MLLM chart understanding by providing a more realistic and faithful measure of progress. Project page and leaderboard: this https URL

Comments:<br>121 pages, 90 figures

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as:<br>arXiv:2406.18521 [cs.CL]

(or<br>arXiv:2406.18521v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.18521

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history<br>From: Zirui Wang [view email]<br>[v1]<br>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:50:11 UTC (13,395 KB)

Full-text links:<br>Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs, by Zirui Wang and 12 other authors<br>View PDF<br>TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

next >

new<br>recent<br>| 2024-06

Change to browse by:

cs<br>cs.CV

References & Citations

NASA ADS<br>Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation<br>Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

&times;

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |<br>Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Major funding support from

toggle arxiv chart charxiv understanding papers

Related Articles